Public comparison report

PC/PBT Material Family Comparison

3DPIceland Labs

3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
2026-10-04 18:10:00

Public-data contract: only explicitly allowlisted MaterialIDs and existing Verified Material Summary scores are included. No measurements or scores are recalculated.
Comparison scope: Stable Material Family preset for PC/PBT. Every included MaterialID has explicit Public reports opt-in.
Materials compared
2
Overall score available
1
All 8 axes available
0

Engineering-axis leaders in this comparison

AxisLeading materialScore
OverallExtrudr DuraPro PC/PBT CF Black44
TensileExtrudr DuraPro Neon Green PC/PBT Green33
Impact—n/a
IzodExtrudr DuraPro PC/PBT CF Black12
CharpyExtrudr DuraPro PC/PBT CF Black12
StiffnessExtrudr DuraPro PC/PBT CF Black85
ConsistencyExtrudr DuraPro Neon Green PC/PBT Green90
Layer adhesionExtrudr DuraPro Neon Green PC/PBT Green43
ThermalExtrudr DuraPro Neon Green PC/PBT Green50
Overall comparison
Extrudr DuraPro PC/PBT CF Black
44/100
Tensile comparison
Extrudr DuraPro Neon Green PC/PBT Green
33/100
Extrudr DuraPro PC/PBT CF Black
23/100
Izod comparison
Extrudr DuraPro PC/PBT CF Black
12/100
Charpy comparison
Extrudr DuraPro PC/PBT CF Black
12/100
Stiffness comparison
Extrudr DuraPro PC/PBT CF Black
85/100
Extrudr DuraPro Neon Green PC/PBT Green
66/100
Thermal comparison
Extrudr DuraPro Neon Green PC/PBT Green
50/100
Extrudr DuraPro PC/PBT CF Black
50/100

Materials and evidence context

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerProduct lineTypeReinforcementRigid test coverageEngineering axes
MAT0030Extrudr DuraPro PC/PBT CF BlackExtrudrDuraProPC/PBTCFComplete; 5/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 2/2 measured, 2/2 scored; Overall eligible; policy engineering-score-v70-17/8
MAT0031Extrudr DuraPro Neon Green PC/PBT GreenExtrudrDuraProPC/PBTPartial; 4/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 0/2 measured, 0/2 scored; Overall unavailable: missing measurements or references; policy engineering-score-v70-15/8

Side-by-side engineering scores

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerReinforcementRigid coverageEvidenceOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpyStiffnessConsistencyLayer adhesionThermalFixture °CMethodThermal limitationMSRP USD/kg
MAT0030Extrudr DuraPro PC/PBT CF BlackExtrudrCFComplete; 5/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 2/2 measured, 2/2 scored; Overall eligible; policy engineering-score-v70-17/844/10023/100—12/10012/10085/10085/10018/10050/100100 °C3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.$54.34
MAT0031Extrudr DuraPro Neon Green PC/PBT GreenExtrudrPartial; 4/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 0/2 measured, 0/2 scored; Overall unavailable: missing measurements or references; policy engineering-score-v70-15/8—33/100———66/10090/10043/10050/10099 °C3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.$45.64
Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements and do not replace manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.

Testing methodology · Engineering methodology whitepaper · Download PDF

Extrudr DuraPro PC/PBT CF Black

Izod and Charpy Impact Strength

Izod Impact Strength · 2026-10-03
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 9.866 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 0.235 kJ/m²; CV 2.383%; Samples 9; Confidence 9
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.

Charpy Impact Strength · 2026-10-03
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 9.673 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 0.348 kJ/m²; CV 3.602%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.

Score policy engineering-score-v70-1: Overall requires tensile, stiffness, consistency, layer adhesion and the Izod/Charpy impact family, each with equal weight. Both impact methods and configured versioned references are required. Missing results and unconfigured scores remain n/a. Legacy Impact is historical only; thermal remains separate. Engineering-axis counts describe displayed evidence, not Overall completeness.