Public engineering report

Yasin Standard Black ASA CF Black

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0009

3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
Generated 2026-10-04 18:07:33

Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.

Rigid test coverage

Complete; 5/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 2/2 measured, 2/2 scored; Overall eligible; policy engineering-score-v70-1

Engineering axes

7/8

Public MSRP

$33.44 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialID	MAT0009
Material	Yasin Standard Black ASA CF Black
Manufacturer	Yasin
Product line	Standard
Base material	ASA
Category	Engineering
Variant / finish	—
Reinforcement	CF
Color	Black

Governed engineering profile

Overall	40/100
Tensile	20/100
Impact	—
Izod	6/100
Charpy	7/100
Stiffness	63/100
Consistency	86/100
Layer adhesion	25/100
Thermal	42/100
Best available axis	consistency

Engineering score profile

Overall

40/100

Tensile

20/100

Impact

—

Izod

6/100

Charpy

7/100

Stiffness

63/100

Consistency

86/100

Layer adhesion

25/100

Thermal

42/100

Engineering radar

Selected material

Material average - ASA

Manufacturer average - Yasin

Legacy Impact radar: 15.976 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.

Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.

Fixture thermal result

83 °C · score 42/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

Metric	Selected material	Material average	Manufacturer average
Overall	40/100	—	—
Tensile	20/100	19/100	25/100
Impact	—	—	—
Izod	6/100	17/100	11/100
Charpy	7/100	30/100	12/100
Stiffness	63/100	68/100	75/100
Consistency	86/100	71/100	72/100
Layer adhesion	25/100	20/100	19/100
Thermal	42/100	—	—

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

Measurement	Average	Std. deviation	CV	Samples	Confidence
Tensile upright	6.46 MPa	2.245 MPa	34.7%	9	9/10
Tensile flat	25.917 MPa	3.833 MPa	14.8%	10	10/10
Impact upright	5.225 kJ/m²	1.461 kJ/m²	28%	10	10/10
Impact flat	12.98 kJ/m²	1.799 kJ/m²	13.9%	10	10/10
Izod	5.07 kJ/m²	0.134 kJ/m²	2.6%	10	10/10
Charpy	5.3 kJ/m²	0.101 kJ/m²	1.9%	9	9/10
Stiffness modulus	1882.778 MPa	—	—	—	—
Stiffness deflection	2.882 mm	—	—	—	—

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

Module	Measured date
Tensile	Not recorded
Impact	Not recorded
Izod	2026-10-02
Charpy	2026-10-02
Stiffness	Not recorded
Thermal	Not recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Yasin Standard Black ASA CF Black has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Izod.

Data-driven review: Yasin Standard Black ASA CF Black is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 24% overall, is missing enough context for the material-family average, and is missing enough context for the manufacturer average. Its strongest engineering signal is Consistency, while Izod is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.

Best feature

Consistency

Main limitation

Izod

Dataset position

Better than 24%

62 / 80

Strengths

Consistency: 86/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.

Limitations

Tensile: 20/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
Izod/Charpy impact family: 6/100. Validate impact or shock-loaded components against their application requirements.
Layer adhesion: 25/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
Avoid high tensile load applications
Avoid high impact components

Metric rankings and percentiles

Metric	Score	Rank	Percentile
Overall	40/100	62 / 80	Better than 24%
Tensile	20/100	195 / 243	Better than 20%
Impact	—	—	—
Izod	6/100	52 / 83	Better than 39%
Charpy	7/100	48 / 82	Better than 43%
Stiffness	63/100	191 / 240	Better than 21%
Consistency	86/100	24 / 243	Better than 91%
Layer adhesion	25/100	116 / 243	Better than 53%
Thermal	42/100	44 / 226	Better than 81%

Decision guidance

Use this material mainly for low-load, visual or experimental parts.
Review the listed alternatives if the application needs stronger overall performance.
Do not choose it as a tensile-strength benchmark material.
Validate impact-focused or shock-loaded designs against the measured Izod/Charpy results.

Better alternatives

MaterialID	Material	Manufacturer	Overall	Tensile	Impact	Izod	Charpy
MAT0015	Prusa3D Prusament ASA Pro Green	Prusa3D	48/100	23/100	—

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialID	Material	Manufacturer	Overall	Tensile	Impact	Izod	Charpy
MAT0015	Prusa3D Prusament ASA Pro Green	Prusa3D	48/100	23/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0197	Siraya Tech Fiberheart Black ASA GF Black	Siraya Tech	43/100	21/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0010	Yasin Standard Black ASA GF Black	Yasin	42/100	21/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0012	Prusa3D Prusament Galaxy Black ASA Black	Prusa3D	41/100	18/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0218	Eryone Standard White ASA GF White	Eryone	40/100	17/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0011	Extrudr DuraPro Neon Green ASA GF Green	Extrudr	40/100	15/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0008	Extrudr DuraPro ASA CF Black	Extrudr	39/100	15/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0213	Eryone Standard Black ASA CF Black	Eryone	38/100	13/100	—	n/a	n/a

Public links

Manufacturer website Download PDF

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.

Izod and Charpy Impact Strength

Izod Impact Strength · 2026-10-02
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 5.07 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 0.134 kJ/m²; CV 2.636%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.

Charpy Impact Strength · 2026-10-02
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 5.3 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 0.101 kJ/m²; CV 1.905%; Samples 9; Confidence 9
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.