Public engineering report

Extrudr DuraPro Neon Green ASA GF Green

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0011
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
Generated 2026-10-04 18:07:33
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Rigid test coverage
Complete; 5/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 2/2 measured, 2/2 scored; Overall eligible; policy engineering-score-v70-1
Engineering axes
7/8
Public MSRP
$42.27 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0011
MaterialExtrudr DuraPro Neon Green ASA GF Green
ManufacturerExtrudr
Product lineDuraPro
Base materialASA
CategoryEngineering
Variant / finish—
ReinforcementGF
ColorGreen

Governed engineering profile

Overall40/100
Tensile15/100
Impact—
Izod13/100
Charpy13/100
Stiffness73/100
Consistency78/100
Layer adhesion22/100
Thermal43/100
Best available axisconsistency

Engineering score profile

Overall
40/100
Tensile
15/100
Impact
—
Izod
13/100
Charpy
13/100
Stiffness
73/100
Consistency
78/100
Layer adhesion
22/100
Thermal
43/100

Engineering radar

TensileLegacy Impact %IzodCharpyStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - ASA
Manufacturer average - Extrudr

Legacy Impact radar: 16.895 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.

Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.

Fixture thermal result

85 °C · score 43/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall40/100——
Tensile15/10019/10025/100
Impact———
Izod13/10017/1009/100
Charpy13/10030/10012/100
Stiffness73/10068/10070/100
Consistency78/10071/10078/100
Layer adhesion22/10020/10025/100
Thermal43/100——

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright4.476 MPa2.383 MPa53.2%1010/10
Tensile flat20.057 MPa4.08 MPa20.3%1010/10
Impact upright3.793 kJ/m²0.478 kJ/m²12.6%1010/10
Impact flat15.459 kJ/m²1.506 kJ/m²9.7%1010/10
Izod10.124 kJ/m²0.607 kJ/m²6%88/10
Charpy10.152 kJ/m²0.73 kJ/m²7.2%1010/10
Stiffness modulus2196.574 MPa————
Stiffness deflection2.47 mm————

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
Izod2026-10-03
Charpy2026-10-03
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Extrudr DuraPro Neon Green ASA GF Green has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Izod.
Data-driven review: Extrudr DuraPro Neon Green ASA GF Green is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 28% overall, is missing enough context for the material-family average, and is missing enough context for the manufacturer average. Its strongest engineering signal is Consistency, while Izod is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Izod
Dataset position
Better than 28%
59 / 80

Strengths

  • Consistency: 78/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.
  • Stiffness: 73/100. Stiffness is a relative advantage in this comparison group.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 15/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Izod/Charpy impact family: 13/100. Validate impact or shock-loaded components against their application requirements.
  • Layer adhesion: 22/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
  • Stiffness is useful for shape stability, but impact tolerance is a separate limitation.
  • The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

  • Rigid brackets, fixtures and shape-stable prototypes
  • Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications
  • Avoid high impact components

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall40/10059 / 80Better than 28%
Tensile15/100225 / 243Better than 8%
Impact———
Izod13/10019 / 83Better than 78%
Charpy13/10022 / 82Better than 74%
Stiffness73/100142 / 240Better than 41%
Consistency78/100104 / 243Better than 58%
Layer adhesion22/100132 / 243Better than 46%
Thermal43/10039 / 226Better than 83%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
MAT0015Prusa3D Prusament ASA Pro GreenPrusa3D48/10023/100—

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
MAT0015Prusa3D Prusament ASA Pro GreenPrusa3D48/10023/100—n/an/a
MAT0197Siraya Tech Fiberheart Black ASA GF BlackSiraya Tech43/10021/100—n/an/a
MAT0010Yasin Standard Black ASA GF BlackYasin42/10021/100—n/an/a
MAT0012Prusa3D Prusament Galaxy Black ASA BlackPrusa3D41/10018/100—n/an/a
MAT0218Eryone Standard White ASA GF WhiteEryone40/10017/100—n/an/a
MAT0009Yasin Standard Black ASA CF BlackYasin40/10020/100—n/an/a
MAT0008Extrudr DuraPro ASA CF BlackExtrudr39/10015/100—n/an/a
MAT0213Eryone Standard Black ASA CF BlackEryone38/10013/100—n/an/a

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.

Izod and Charpy Impact Strength

Izod Impact Strength · 2026-10-03
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 10.124 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 0.607 kJ/m²; CV 5.993%; Samples 8; Confidence 8
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.

Charpy Impact Strength · 2026-10-03
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 10.152 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 0.73 kJ/m²; CV 7.193%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.