Public engineering report

Prusa3D Prusament Galaxy Black ASA Black

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0012

3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
Generated 2026-10-04 18:07:33

Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.

Rigid test coverage

Complete; 5/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 2/2 measured, 2/2 scored; Overall eligible; policy engineering-score-v70-1

Engineering axes

7/8

Public MSRP

$34.00 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialID	MAT0012
Material	Prusa3D Prusament Galaxy Black ASA Black
Manufacturer	Prusa3D
Product line	Prusament
Base material	ASA
Category	Engineering
Variant / finish	—
Reinforcement	—
Color	Black

Governed engineering profile

Overall	41/100
Tensile	18/100
Impact	—
Izod	26/100
Charpy	43/100
Stiffness	60/100
Consistency	73/100
Layer adhesion	21/100
Thermal	39/100
Best available axis	consistency

Engineering score profile

Overall

41/100

Tensile

18/100

Impact

—

Izod

26/100

Charpy

43/100

Stiffness

60/100

Consistency

73/100

Layer adhesion

21/100

Thermal

39/100

Engineering radar

Selected material

Material average - ASA

Manufacturer average - Prusa3D

Legacy Impact radar: 35.322 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.

Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.

Fixture thermal result

77 °C · score 39/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

Metric	Selected material	Material average	Manufacturer average
Overall	41/100	—	—
Tensile	18/100	19/100	31/100
Impact	—	—	—
Izod	26/100	17/100	9/100
Charpy	43/100	30/100	12/100
Stiffness	60/100	68/100	84/100
Consistency	73/100	71/100	76/100
Layer adhesion	21/100	20/100	32/100
Thermal	39/100	—	—

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

Measurement	Average	Std. deviation	CV	Samples	Confidence
Tensile upright	4.968 MPa	1.493 MPa	30.1%	10	10/10
Tensile flat	23.963 MPa	2.08 MPa	8.7%	10	10/10
Impact upright	2.089 kJ/m²	0.532 kJ/m²	25.5%	10	10/10
Impact flat	38.159 kJ/m²	3.126 kJ/m²	8.2%	10	10/10
Izod	20.818 kJ/m²	4.598 kJ/m²	22.1%	10	10/10
Charpy	34.295 kJ/m²	15.966 kJ/m²	46.6%	10	10/10
Stiffness modulus	1808.943 MPa	—	—	—	—
Stiffness deflection	3 mm	—	—	—	—

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

Module	Measured date
Tensile	Not recorded
Impact	Not recorded
Izod	2026-09-29
Charpy	2026-09-29
Stiffness	Not recorded
Thermal	Not recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Prusa3D Prusament Galaxy Black ASA Black has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Tensile.

Data-driven review: Prusa3D Prusament Galaxy Black ASA Black is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 38% overall, is missing enough context for the material-family average, and is missing enough context for the manufacturer average. Its strongest engineering signal is Consistency, while Tensile is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.

Best feature

Consistency

Main limitation

Tensile

Dataset position

Better than 38%

51 / 80

Strengths

Consistency: 73/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.
Izod/Charpy impact family: 34/100. The two-method impact score is competitive against the material-family context.

Limitations

Tensile: 18/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
Izod/Charpy impact family: 34/100. Validate impact or shock-loaded components against their application requirements.
Layer adhesion: 21/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
Avoid high tensile load applications
Avoid high impact components

Metric rankings and percentiles

Metric	Score	Rank	Percentile
Overall	41/100	51 / 80	Better than 38%
Tensile	18/100	213 / 243	Better than 13%
Impact	—	—	—
Izod	26/100	5 / 83	Better than 95%
Charpy	43/100	5 / 82	Better than 95%
Stiffness	60/100	198 / 240	Better than 18%
Consistency	73/100	155 / 243	Better than 37%
Layer adhesion	21/100	148 / 243	Better than 40%
Thermal	39/100	60 / 226	Better than 74%

Decision guidance

Use this material mainly for low-load, visual or experimental parts.
Review the listed alternatives if the application needs stronger overall performance.
Do not choose it as a tensile-strength benchmark material.
Validate impact-focused or shock-loaded designs against the measured Izod/Charpy results.

Better alternatives

MaterialID	Material	Manufacturer	Overall	Tensile	Impact	Izod	Charpy
MAT0015	Prusa3D Prusament ASA Pro Green	Prusa3D	48/100	23/100	—

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialID	Material	Manufacturer	Overall	Tensile	Impact	Izod	Charpy
MAT0015	Prusa3D Prusament ASA Pro Green	Prusa3D	48/100	23/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0197	Siraya Tech Fiberheart Black ASA GF Black	Siraya Tech	43/100	21/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0010	Yasin Standard Black ASA GF Black	Yasin	42/100	21/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0218	Eryone Standard White ASA GF White	Eryone	40/100	17/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0011	Extrudr DuraPro Neon Green ASA GF Green	Extrudr	40/100	15/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0009	Yasin Standard Black ASA CF Black	Yasin	40/100	20/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0008	Extrudr DuraPro ASA CF Black	Extrudr	39/100	15/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0213	Eryone Standard Black ASA CF Black	Eryone	38/100	13/100	—	n/a	n/a

Public links

Manufacturer website Video review Download PDF

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.

Izod and Charpy Impact Strength

Charpy Impact Strength · 2026-09-29
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 34.295 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 15.966 kJ/m²; CV 46.553%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.

Izod Impact Strength · 2026-09-29
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 20.818 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 4.598 kJ/m²; CV 22.088%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.