Public engineering report

Prusa3D Prusament ASA Pro Green

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0015

3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
Generated 2026-10-04 18:07:33

Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.

Rigid test coverage

Complete; 5/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 2/2 measured, 2/2 scored; Overall eligible; policy engineering-score-v70-1

Engineering axes

7/8

Public MSRP

$26.40 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialID	MAT0015
Material	Prusa3D Prusament ASA Pro Green
Manufacturer	Prusa3D
Product line	Prusament
Base material	ASA
Category	Engineering
Variant / finish	Pro
Reinforcement	—
Color	Green

Governed engineering profile

Overall	48/100
Tensile	23/100
Impact	—
Izod	31/100
Charpy	81/100
Stiffness	71/100
Consistency	66/100
Layer adhesion	24/100
Thermal	45/100
Best available axis	Charpy impact resistance

Engineering score profile

Overall

48/100

Tensile

23/100

Impact

—

Izod

31/100

Charpy

81/100

Stiffness

71/100

Consistency

66/100

Layer adhesion

24/100

Thermal

45/100

Engineering radar

Selected material

Material average - ASA

Manufacturer average - Prusa3D

Legacy Impact radar: 36.808 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.

Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.

Fixture thermal result

90 °C · score 45/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

Metric	Selected material	Material average	Manufacturer average
Overall	48/100	—	—
Tensile	23/100	19/100	31/100
Impact	—	—	—
Izod	31/100	17/100	9/100
Charpy	81/100	30/100	12/100
Stiffness	71/100	68/100	84/100
Consistency	66/100	71/100	76/100
Layer adhesion	24/100	20/100	32/100
Thermal	45/100	—	—

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

Measurement	Average	Std. deviation	CV	Samples	Confidence
Tensile upright	7.029 MPa	2.818 MPa	40.1%	10	10/10
Tensile flat	29.87 MPa	4.561 MPa	15.3%	10	10/10
Impact upright	3.427 kJ/m²	0.516 kJ/m²	15.1%	10	10/10
Impact flat	38.515 kJ/m²	2.411 kJ/m²	6.3%	10	10/10
Izod	24.962 kJ/m²	8.789 kJ/m²	35.2%	10	10/10
Charpy	65.179 kJ/m²	28.002 kJ/m²	43%	8	8/10
Stiffness modulus	2133.089 MPa	—	—	—	—
Stiffness deflection	2.544 mm	—	—	—	—

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

Module	Measured date
Tensile	Not recorded
Impact	Not recorded
Izod	2026-09-29
Charpy	2026-09-29
Stiffness	Not recorded
Thermal	Not recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Prusa3D Prusament ASA Pro Green has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Charpy, while the weakest axis is Tensile.

Data-driven review: Prusa3D Prusament ASA Pro Green is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 75% overall, is missing enough context for the material-family average, and is missing enough context for the manufacturer average. Its strongest engineering signal is Charpy, while Tensile is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.

Best feature

Charpy

Main limitation

Tensile

Dataset position

Better than 75%

21 / 80

Strengths

Izod/Charpy impact family: 56/100. The two-method impact score is competitive against the material-family context.
Stiffness: 71/100. Stiffness is a relative advantage in this comparison group.

Limitations

Tensile: 23/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
Layer adhesion: 24/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

Rigid brackets, fixtures and shape-stable prototypes
Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
Avoid high tensile load applications

Metric rankings and percentiles

Metric	Score	Rank	Percentile
Overall	48/100	21 / 80	Better than 75%
Tensile	23/100	172 / 243	Better than 30%
Impact	—	—	—
Izod	31/100	4 / 83	Better than 96%
Charpy	81/100	2 / 82	Better than 99%
Stiffness	71/100	151 / 240	Better than 38%
Consistency	66/100	203 / 243	Better than 17%
Layer adhesion	24/100	122 / 243	Better than 50%
Thermal	45/100	26 / 226	Better than 89%

Decision guidance

Use this material mainly for low-load, visual or experimental parts.
Do not choose it as a tensile-strength benchmark material.

Better alternatives

MaterialID	Material	Manufacturer	Overall	Tensile	Impact	Izod	Charpy
No stronger same-base-material alternatives were identified in the current governed dataset.

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialID	Material	Manufacturer	Overall	Tensile	Impact	Izod	Charpy
MAT0197	Siraya Tech Fiberheart Black ASA GF Black	Siraya Tech	43/100	21/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0010	Yasin Standard Black ASA GF Black	Yasin	42/100	21/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0012	Prusa3D Prusament Galaxy Black ASA Black	Prusa3D	41/100	18/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0218	Eryone Standard White ASA GF White	Eryone	40/100	17/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0011	Extrudr DuraPro Neon Green ASA GF Green	Extrudr	40/100	15/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0009	Yasin Standard Black ASA CF Black	Yasin	40/100	20/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0008	Extrudr DuraPro ASA CF Black	Extrudr	39/100	15/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0213	Eryone Standard Black ASA CF Black	Eryone	38/100	13/100	—	n/a	n/a

Public links

Manufacturer website Video review Download PDF

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.

Izod and Charpy Impact Strength

Izod Impact Strength · 2026-09-29
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 24.962 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 8.789 kJ/m²; CV 35.208%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.

Charpy Impact Strength · 2026-09-29
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 65.179 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 28.002 kJ/m²; CV 42.962%; Samples 8; Confidence 8
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.