Public engineering report

Prusa3D Prusament PA11 CF Black

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0018
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v60.0.6 WORKFLOW-RELIABILITY - Bug Fixes and Workflow Reliability
Generated 2026-08-25 19:02:26
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Test coverage
Complete
Engineering axes
6/6
Public MSRP
$204.00 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0018
MaterialPrusa3D Prusament PA11 CF Black
ManufacturerPrusa3D
Product linePrusament
Base materialPA11
CategoryEngineering
Variant / finish
ReinforcementCF
ColorBlack

Governed engineering profile

Overall49/100
Tensile34/100
Impact25/100
Stiffness100/100
Consistency76/100
Layer adhesion10/100
Thermal71/100
Best available axisstiffness

Engineering score profile

Overall
49/100
Tensile
34/100
Impact
25/100
Stiffness
100/100
Consistency
76/100
Layer adhesion
10/100
Thermal
71/100

Engineering radar

TensileImpactStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PA11
Manufacturer average - Prusa3D

All axes use existing governed 0–100 engineering scores. Missing axes are shown at zero and remain listed as n/a elsewhere in the report.

Fixture thermal result

142 °C · score 71/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall49/10049/10049/100
Tensile34/10034/10031/100
Impact25/10025/10021/100
Stiffness100/100100/10084/100
Consistency76/10076/10079/100
Layer adhesion10/10010/10032/100
Thermal71/100

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright4.7 MPa1.982 MPa42.2%99/10
Tensile flat49.111 MPa5.071 MPa10.3%1010/10
Impact upright74.527 kJ/m²10.886 kJ/m²14.6%1010/10
Impact flat433.368 kJ/m²120.006 kJ/m²27.7%1010/10
Stiffness modulus3968.005 MPa
Stiffness deflection1.368 mm

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Prusa3D Prusament PA11 CF Black has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is above its material-family average by 0 points and below its manufacturer average by 0,5 points. Its strongest measured axis is Stiffness, while the weakest axis is Layer Adhesion.
Data-driven review: Prusa3D Prusament PA11 CF Black is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 59% overall, is roughly aligned with the material-family average, and is roughly aligned with the manufacturer average. Its strongest engineering signal is Stiffness, while Layer Adhesion is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Stiffness
Main limitation
Layer Adhesion
Dataset position
Better than 59%
96 / 234

Strengths

  • Consistency: 76/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.
  • Stiffness: 100/100. Stiffness is a relative advantage in this comparison group.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 34/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Impact: 25/100. Avoid high impact or shock-loaded components without additional validation.
  • Layer adhesion: 10/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
  • Stiffness is useful for shape stability, but impact tolerance is a separate limitation.
  • The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

  • Rigid brackets, fixtures and shape-stable prototypes
  • Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications
  • Avoid high impact components

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall49/10096 / 234Better than 59%
Tensile34/10062 / 226Better than 73%
Impact25/10088 / 226Better than 62%
Stiffness100/1001 / 223Better than 100%
Consistency76/100154 / 231Better than 34%
Layer adhesion10/100212 / 226Better than 7%
Thermal71/1005 / 209Better than 98%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
No stronger same-base-material alternatives were identified in the current governed dataset.

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
No same-material peers with governed score context are available.

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.