Public engineering report

Fillamentum FX256 PA12 Clear

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0022
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v60.0.6 WORKFLOW-RELIABILITY - Bug Fixes and Workflow Reliability
Generated 2026-08-25 19:02:26
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Test coverage
Complete
Engineering axes
6/6
Public MSRP
$46.74 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0022
MaterialFillamentum FX256 PA12 Clear
ManufacturerFillamentum
Product lineFX256
Base materialPA12
CategoryEngineering
Variant / finish
Reinforcement
ColorClear

Governed engineering profile

Overall45/100
Tensile28/100
Impact47/100
Stiffness26/100
Consistency68/100
Layer adhesion54/100
Thermal33/100
Best available axisconsistency

Engineering score profile

Overall
45/100
Tensile
28/100
Impact
47/100
Stiffness
26/100
Consistency
68/100
Layer adhesion
54/100
Thermal
33/100

Engineering radar

TensileImpactStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PA12
Manufacturer average - Fillamentum

All axes use existing governed 0–100 engineering scores. Missing axes are shown at zero and remain listed as n/a elsewhere in the report.

Fixture thermal result

65 °C · score 33/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall45/10045/10049/100
Tensile28/10032/10032/100
Impact47/10040/10047/100
Stiffness26/10054/10026/100
Consistency68/10075/10073/100
Layer adhesion54/10021/10051/100
Thermal33/100

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright15.704 MPa4.843 MPa30.8%1010/10
Tensile flat28.901 MPa2.545 MPa8.8%1010/10
Impact upright166.508 kJ/m²93.981 kJ/m²56.4%1010/10
Impact flat773.533 kJ/m²230.259 kJ/m²29.8%88/10
Stiffness modulus768.801 MPa
Stiffness deflection7.058 mm

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Fillamentum FX256 PA12 Clear has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is above its material-family average by 0 points and below its manufacturer average by 4,6 points. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Stiffness.
Data-driven review: Fillamentum FX256 PA12 Clear is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 36% overall, is roughly aligned with the material-family average, and is below the manufacturer average by 4,6 points. Its strongest engineering signal is Consistency, while Stiffness is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Stiffness
Dataset position
Better than 36%
150 / 234

Strengths

  • Layer adhesion: 54/100. Z-axis bonding is better than the material-family context.
  • Impact: 47/100. Impact behavior is competitive against the material-family context.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 28/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Stiffness: 26/100. Expect less shape stability than the stronger materials in the same family.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
  • Layer bonding may be acceptable, but stiffness is still a limiting design factor.
  • The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall45/100150 / 234Better than 36%
Tensile28/100120 / 226Better than 47%
Impact47/10035 / 226Better than 85%
Stiffness26/100223 / 223Better than 0%
Consistency68/100209 / 231Better than 10%
Layer adhesion54/10014 / 226Better than 94%
Thermal33/10073 / 209Better than 66%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT0214Eryone Standard Black PA12 CF BlackEryone53/10043/10046/100
MAT0167BambuLab Basic PA12 PAHT CF BlackBambuLab51/10039/10041/100
MAT0020Extrudr DuraPro PA12 BlackExtrudr50/10034/10050/100

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT0214Eryone Standard Black PA12 CF BlackEryone53/10043/10046/100
MAT0167BambuLab Basic PA12 PAHT CF BlackBambuLab51/10039/10041/100
MAT0020Extrudr DuraPro PA12 BlackExtrudr50/10034/10050/100
MAT0209Eryone Standard Black PA12 GF BlackEryone49/10033/10067/100
MAT0019MatterHackers NylonX PA12 CF BlackMatterHackers42/10032/10022/100
MAT0239Yasin Standard Black PA12 CF BlackYasin41/10033/10025/100
MAT0196Extrudr DuraPro Black PA12 CF BlackExtrudr40/10028/10044/100
MAT0021Yasin Standard Black PA12 BlackYasin31/10022/10013/100

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.