Public engineering report

Prusa3D Prusament PC Blend PC Black

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0033

3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
Generated 2026-10-04 18:07:33

Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.

Rigid test coverage

Complete; 5/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 2/2 measured, 2/2 scored; Overall eligible; policy engineering-score-v70-1

Engineering axes

7/8

Public MSRP

$49.78 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialID	MAT0033
Material	Prusa3D Prusament PC Blend PC Black
Manufacturer	Prusa3D
Product line	Prusament
Base material	PC
Category	Engineering
Variant / finish	—
Reinforcement	—
Color	Black

Governed engineering profile

Overall	48/100
Tensile	39/100
Impact	—
Izod	7/100
Charpy	5/100
Stiffness	68/100
Consistency	87/100
Layer adhesion	40/100
Thermal	47/100
Best available axis	consistency

Engineering score profile

Overall

48/100

Tensile

39/100

Impact

—

Izod

7/100

Charpy

5/100

Stiffness

68/100

Consistency

87/100

Layer adhesion

40/100

Thermal

47/100

Engineering radar

Selected material

Material average - PC

Manufacturer average - Prusa3D

Legacy Impact radar: 38.742 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.

Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.

Fixture thermal result

93 °C · score 47/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

Metric	Selected material	Material average	Manufacturer average
Overall	48/100	—	—
Tensile	39/100	30/100	31/100
Impact	—	—	—
Izod	7/100	10/100	9/100
Charpy	5/100	9/100	12/100
Stiffness	68/100	82/100	84/100
Consistency	87/100	74/100	76/100
Layer adhesion	40/100	19/100	32/100
Thermal	47/100	—	—

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

Measurement	Average	Std. deviation	CV	Samples	Confidence
Tensile upright	17.673 MPa	3.075 MPa	17.4%	10	10/10
Tensile flat	43.928 MPa	1.09 MPa	2.5%	10	10/10
Impact upright	2.939 kJ/m²	0.385 kJ/m²	13.1%	10	10/10
Impact flat	41.207 kJ/m²	7.919 kJ/m²	19.2%	10	10/10
Izod	5.548 kJ/m²	0.183 kJ/m²	3.3%	10	10/10
Charpy	4.356 kJ/m²	1.229 kJ/m²	28.2%	10	10/10
Stiffness modulus	2038.809 MPa	—	—	—	—
Stiffness deflection	2.662 mm	—	—	—	—

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

Module	Measured date
Tensile	Not recorded
Impact	Not recorded
Izod	2026-09-29
Charpy	2026-09-29
Stiffness	Not recorded
Thermal	Not recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Prusa3D Prusament PC Blend PC Black has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Charpy.

Data-driven review: Prusa3D Prusament PC Blend PC Black is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 78% overall, is missing enough context for the material-family average, and is missing enough context for the manufacturer average. Its strongest engineering signal is Consistency, while Charpy is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.

Best feature

Consistency

Main limitation

Charpy

Dataset position

Better than 78%

19 / 80

Strengths

Layer adhesion: 40/100. Z-axis bonding is better than the material-family context.
Consistency: 87/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.
Tensile: 39/100. Tensile behavior is competitive against the material-family context.

Limitations

Tensile: 39/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
Izod/Charpy impact family: 6/100. Validate impact or shock-loaded components against their application requirements.
Stiffness: 68/100. Expect less shape stability than the stronger materials in the same family.

Engineering trade-offs

Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
Avoid high impact components

Metric rankings and percentiles

Metric	Score	Rank	Percentile
Overall	48/100	19 / 80	Better than 78%
Tensile	39/100	22 / 243	Better than 91%
Impact	—	—	—
Izod	7/100	47 / 83	Better than 45%
Charpy	5/100	56 / 82	Better than 33%
Stiffness	68/100	166 / 240	Better than 31%
Consistency	87/100	16 / 243	Better than 94%
Layer adhesion	40/100	50 / 243	Better than 80%
Thermal	47/100	22 / 226	Better than 91%

Decision guidance

Use this material mainly for low-load, visual or experimental parts.
Review the listed alternatives if the application needs stronger overall performance.
Validate impact-focused or shock-loaded designs against the measured Izod/Charpy results.

Better alternatives

MaterialID	Material	Manufacturer	Overall	Tensile	Impact	Izod	Charpy
MAT0029	Prusa3D Prusament PC Blend PC CF Black	Prusa3D	52/100	35/100	—

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialID	Material	Manufacturer	Overall	Tensile	Impact	Izod	Charpy
MAT0029	Prusa3D Prusament PC Blend PC CF Black	Prusa3D	52/100	35/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0028	Prima Creator PrimaSelect PC CF Black	Prima Creator	46/100	38/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0034	Yasin Standard Black PC Plus Black	Yasin	31/100	12/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0168	BambuLab Basic PC White	BambuLab	—	30/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0032	Prima Creator PrimaSelect PC Black	Prima Creator	—	26/100	—	n/a	n/a

Public links

Manufacturer website Video review Download PDF

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.

Izod and Charpy Impact Strength

Izod Impact Strength · 2026-09-29
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 5.548 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 0.183 kJ/m²; CV 3.297%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.

Charpy Impact Strength · 2026-09-29
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 4.356 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 1.229 kJ/m²; CV 28.218%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.