Public engineering report

Prusa3D Prusament Natural PP GF White

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0037
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
Generated 2026-10-04 18:07:33
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Rigid test coverage
Complete; 5/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 2/2 measured, 2/2 scored; Overall eligible; policy engineering-score-v70-1
Engineering axes
7/8
Public MSRP
$82.82 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0037
MaterialPrusa3D Prusament Natural PP GF White
ManufacturerPrusa3D
Product linePrusament
Base materialPP
CategoryEngineering
Variant / finish—
ReinforcementGF
ColorWhite

Governed engineering profile

Overall45/100
Tensile36/100
Impact—
Izod17/100
Charpy17/100
Stiffness72/100
Consistency86/100
Layer adhesion16/100
Thermal49/100
Best available axisconsistency

Engineering score profile

Overall
45/100
Tensile
36/100
Impact
—
Izod
17/100
Charpy
17/100
Stiffness
72/100
Consistency
86/100
Layer adhesion
16/100
Thermal
49/100

Engineering radar

TensileLegacy Impact %IzodCharpyStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PP
Manufacturer average - Prusa3D

Legacy Impact radar: 27.682 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.

Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.

Fixture thermal result

98 °C · score 49/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall45/100——
Tensile36/10024/10031/100
Impact———
Izod17/10016/1009/100
Charpy17/10016/10012/100
Stiffness72/10059/10084/100
Consistency86/10087/10076/100
Layer adhesion16/10033/10032/100
Thermal49/100——

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright7.69 MPa2.935 MPa38.2%99/10
Tensile flat49.157 MPa5.206 MPa10.6%1010/10
Impact upright3.996 kJ/m²0.405 kJ/m²10.1%1010/10
Impact flat27.546 kJ/m²3.542 kJ/m²12.9%1010/10
Izod13.632 kJ/m²0.554 kJ/m²4.1%1010/10
Charpy13.884 kJ/m²0.48 kJ/m²3.5%1010/10
Stiffness modulus2170.732 MPa————
Stiffness deflection2.5 mm————

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
Izod2026-10-02
Charpy2026-10-02
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Prusa3D Prusament Natural PP GF White has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Layer Adhesion.
Data-driven review: Prusa3D Prusament Natural PP GF White is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 58% overall, is missing enough context for the material-family average, and is missing enough context for the manufacturer average. Its strongest engineering signal is Consistency, while Layer Adhesion is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Layer Adhesion
Dataset position
Better than 58%
35 / 80

Strengths

  • Consistency: 86/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.
  • Tensile: 36/100. Tensile behavior is competitive against the material-family context.
  • Stiffness: 72/100. Stiffness is a relative advantage in this comparison group.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 36/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Izod/Charpy impact family: 17/100. Validate impact or shock-loaded components against their application requirements.
  • Layer adhesion: 16/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
  • Stiffness is useful for shape stability, but impact tolerance is a separate limitation.
  • The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

  • Rigid brackets, fixtures and shape-stable prototypes
  • Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high impact components

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall45/10035 / 80Better than 58%
Tensile36/10044 / 243Better than 82%
Impact———
Izod17/10012 / 83Better than 87%
Charpy17/10018 / 82Better than 79%
Stiffness72/100144 / 240Better than 40%
Consistency86/10026 / 243Better than 90%
Layer adhesion16/100175 / 243Better than 28%
Thermal49/10020 / 226Better than 92%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
No stronger same-base-material alternatives were identified in the current governed dataset.

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
MAT0036Prusa3D Prusament PP CF BlackPrusa3D41/10022/100—n/an/a
MAT0194Eryone Standard White PP WhiteEryone—15/100—n/an/a

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.

Izod and Charpy Impact Strength

Charpy Impact Strength · 2026-10-02
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 13.884 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 0.48 kJ/m²; CV 3.457%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.

Izod Impact Strength · 2026-10-02
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 13.632 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 0.554 kJ/m²; CV 4.062%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.