Public engineering report

Prusa3D Prusament Light Yellow PVB Yellow

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0038
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
Generated 2026-10-04 18:07:33
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Rigid test coverage
Partial; 4/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 0/2 measured, 0/2 scored; Overall unavailable: missing measurements or references; policy engineering-score-v70-1
Engineering axes
5/8
Public MSRP
$32.00 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0038
MaterialPrusa3D Prusament Light Yellow PVB Yellow
ManufacturerPrusa3D
Product linePrusament
Base materialPVB
CategorySpecialty
Variant / finish—
Reinforcement—
ColorYellow

Governed engineering profile

Overall—
Tensile35/100
Impact—
Izod—
Charpy—
Stiffness72/100
Consistency82/100
Layer adhesion57/100
Thermal30/100
Best available axisconsistency

Engineering score profile

Overall
—
Tensile
35/100
Impact
—
Izod
—
Charpy
—
Stiffness
72/100
Consistency
82/100
Layer adhesion
57/100
Thermal
30/100

Engineering radar

TensileLegacy Impact %IzodCharpyStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PVB
Manufacturer average - Prusa3D

Legacy Impact radar: 44.949 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.

Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.

Fixture thermal result

59 °C · score 30/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall———
Tensile35/10035/10031/100
Impact———
Izod——9/100
Charpy——12/100
Stiffness72/10072/10084/100
Consistency82/10082/10076/100
Layer adhesion57/10057/10032/100
Thermal30/100——

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright20.559 MPa6.205 MPa30.2%99/10
Tensile flat35.976 MPa1.397 MPa3.9%1010/10
Impact upright3.67 kJ/m²0.3 kJ/m²8.2%1010/10
Impact flat47.548 kJ/m²5.083 kJ/m²10.7%1010/10
Izod—————
Charpy—————
Stiffness modulus2145.491 MPa————
Stiffness deflection2.529 mm————

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
IzodNot recorded
CharpyNot recorded
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Prusa3D Prusament Light Yellow PVB Yellow has a profile awaiting complete scoring evidence. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Thermal.
Data-driven review: Prusa3D Prusament Light Yellow PVB Yellow has incomplete scoring evidence or pending method references. Overall suitability and ranking are unavailable. Available scored axes can be inspected separately; missing scores do not establish weak material performance.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Thermal
Dataset position
—
—

Strengths

  • Consistency: 82/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.
  • Stiffness: 72/100. Stiffness is a relative advantage in this comparison group.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 35/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.

Recommended applications

  • Rigid brackets, fixtures and shape-stable prototypes
  • Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall———
Tensile35/10047 / 243Better than 81%
Impact———
Izod———
Charpy———
Stiffness72/100149 / 240Better than 38%
Consistency82/10049 / 243Better than 80%
Layer adhesion57/10013 / 243Better than 95%
Thermal30/100108 / 226Better than 53%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
No stronger same-base-material alternatives were identified in the current governed dataset.

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
No same-material peers with governed score context are available.

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.