Public engineering report

Prusa3D Prusament PETG Pro Green

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0057

3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
Generated 2026-10-04 18:07:33

Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.

Rigid test coverage

Complete; 5/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 2/2 measured, 2/2 scored; Overall eligible; policy engineering-score-v70-1

Engineering axes

7/8

Public MSRP

$30.40 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialID	MAT0057
Material	Prusa3D Prusament PETG Pro Green
Manufacturer	Prusa3D
Product line	Prusament
Base material	PETG
Category	Standard
Variant / finish	Pro
Reinforcement	—
Color	Green

Governed engineering profile

Overall	34/100
Tensile	31/100
Impact	—
Izod	2/100
Charpy	2/100
Stiffness	57/100
Consistency	69/100
Layer adhesion	10/100
Thermal	34/100
Best available axis	consistency

Engineering score profile

Overall

34/100

Tensile

31/100

Impact

—

Izod

2/100

Charpy

2/100

Stiffness

57/100

Consistency

69/100

Layer adhesion

10/100

Thermal

34/100

Engineering radar

Selected material

Material average - PETG

Manufacturer average - Prusa3D

Legacy Impact radar: 17.029 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.

Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.

Fixture thermal result

68 °C · score 34/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

Metric	Selected material	Material average	Manufacturer average
Overall	34/100	—	—
Tensile	31/100	28/100	31/100
Impact	—	—	—
Izod	2/100	5/100	9/100
Charpy	2/100	4/100	12/100
Stiffness	57/100	60/100	84/100
Consistency	69/100	74/100	76/100
Layer adhesion	10/100	31/100	32/100
Thermal	34/100	—	—

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

Measurement	Average	Std. deviation	CV	Samples	Confidence
Tensile upright	4.422 MPa	2.855 MPa	64.6%	8	8/10
Tensile flat	44.989 MPa	2.536 MPa	5.6%	10	10/10
Impact upright	4.364 kJ/m²	0.788 kJ/m²	18.1%	10	10/10
Impact flat	15.04 kJ/m²	3.776 kJ/m²	25.1%	10	10/10
Izod	1.738 kJ/m²	0.162 kJ/m²	9.3%	10	10/10
Charpy	1.567 kJ/m²	0.654 kJ/m²	41.8%	10	10/10
Stiffness modulus	1708.447 MPa	—	—	—	—
Stiffness deflection	3.176 mm	—	—	—	—

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

Module	Measured date
Tensile	Not recorded
Impact	Not recorded
Izod	2026-09-29
Charpy	2026-09-29
Stiffness	Not recorded
Thermal	Not recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Prusa3D Prusament PETG Pro Green has a low engineering profile. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Charpy.

Data-driven review: Prusa3D Prusament PETG Pro Green is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 5% overall, is missing enough context for the material-family average, and is missing enough context for the manufacturer average. Its strongest engineering signal is Consistency, while Charpy is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.

Best feature

Consistency

Main limitation

Charpy

Dataset position

Better than 5%

77 / 80

Strengths

Best available signal: Consistency at 69/100.

Limitations

Tensile: 31/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
Izod/Charpy impact family: 2/100. Validate impact or shock-loaded components against their application requirements.
Layer adhesion: 10/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
Avoid high tensile load applications
Avoid high impact components

Metric rankings and percentiles

Metric	Score	Rank	Percentile
Overall	34/100	77 / 80	Better than 5%
Tensile	31/100	100 / 243	Better than 59%
Impact	—	—	—
Izod	2/100	82 / 83	Better than 2%
Charpy	2/100	79 / 82	Better than 5%
Stiffness	57/100	206 / 240	Better than 15%
Consistency	69/100	185 / 243	Better than 24%
Layer adhesion	10/100	222 / 243	Better than 9%
Thermal	34/100	73 / 226	Better than 68%

Decision guidance

Use this material mainly for low-load, visual or experimental parts.
Review the listed alternatives if the application needs stronger overall performance.
Do not choose it as a tensile-strength benchmark material.
Validate impact-focused or shock-loaded designs against the measured Izod/Charpy results.

Better alternatives

MaterialID	Material	Manufacturer	Overall	Tensile	Impact
MAT0236	Yasin Standard Black PETG CF Black	Yasin	47/100	30/100	—
MAT0198	Siraya Tech Fiberheart Black PETG Pro CF Black	Siraya Tech	46/100	33/100	—
MAT0235	Yasin Standard Black PETG GF Black	Yasin	44/100	27/100	—

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialID	Material	Manufacturer	Overall	Tensile	Impact	Izod	Charpy
MAT0236	Yasin Standard Black PETG CF Black	Yasin	47/100	30/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0198	Siraya Tech Fiberheart Black PETG Pro CF Black	Siraya Tech	46/100	33/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0235	Yasin Standard Black PETG GF Black	Yasin	44/100	27/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0048	Prusa3D Prusament Jet Black PETG V0 Black	Prusa3D	44/100	26/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0042	Prusa3D Prusament PETG CF Black	Prusa3D	42/100	25/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0043	Prima Creator PrimaSelect PETG GF White	Prima Creator	40/100	31/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0266	Coex 3D Standard Banana Yellow PETG Yellow	Coex 3D	40/100	30/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0061	Prusa3D Prusament Signal White PETG White	Prusa3D	39/100	33/100	—	n/a	n/a

Public links

Manufacturer website Video review Download PDF

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.

Izod and Charpy Impact Strength

Izod Impact Strength · 2026-09-29
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 1.738 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 0.162 kJ/m²; CV 9.298%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.

Charpy Impact Strength · 2026-09-29
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 1.567 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 0.654 kJ/m²; CV 41.753%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.