Public engineering report

Prusa3D Prusament Prusa Orange PETG Orange

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0059
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
Generated 2026-10-04 18:07:33
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Rigid test coverage
Complete; 5/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 2/2 measured, 2/2 scored; Overall eligible; policy engineering-score-v70-1
Engineering axes
7/8
Public MSRP
$30.40 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0059
MaterialPrusa3D Prusament Prusa Orange PETG Orange
ManufacturerPrusa3D
Product linePrusament
Base materialPETG
CategoryStandard
Variant / finish—
Reinforcement—
ColorOrange

Governed engineering profile

Overall38/100
Tensile31/100
Impact—
Izod4/100
Charpy3/100
Stiffness41/100
Consistency74/100
Layer adhesion41/100
Thermal29/100
Best available axisconsistency

Engineering score profile

Overall
38/100
Tensile
31/100
Impact
—
Izod
4/100
Charpy
3/100
Stiffness
41/100
Consistency
74/100
Layer adhesion
41/100
Thermal
29/100

Engineering radar

TensileLegacy Impact %IzodCharpyStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PETG
Manufacturer average - Prusa3D

Legacy Impact radar: 8.272 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.

Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.

Fixture thermal result

57 °C · score 29/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall38/100——
Tensile31/10028/10031/100
Impact———
Izod4/1005/1009/100
Charpy3/1004/10012/100
Stiffness41/10060/10084/100
Consistency74/10074/10076/100
Layer adhesion41/10031/10032/100
Thermal29/100——

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright14.596 MPa3.677 MPa25.2%1010/10
Tensile flat35.284 MPa2.435 MPa6.9%1010/10
Impact upright1.283 kJ/m²0.457 kJ/m²35.6%1010/10
Impact flat8.143 kJ/m²1.782 kJ/m²21.9%1010/10
Izod2.819 kJ/m²0.889 kJ/m²31.5%88/10
Charpy2.122 kJ/m²0.784 kJ/m²36.9%1010/10
Stiffness modulus1230.081 MPa————
Stiffness deflection4.412 mm————

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
Izod2026-10-01
Charpy2026-10-01
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Prusa3D Prusament Prusa Orange PETG Orange has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Charpy.
Data-driven review: Prusa3D Prusament Prusa Orange PETG Orange is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 16% overall, is missing enough context for the material-family average, and is missing enough context for the manufacturer average. Its strongest engineering signal is Consistency, while Charpy is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Charpy
Dataset position
Better than 16%
68 / 80

Strengths

  • Layer adhesion: 41/100. Z-axis bonding is better than the material-family context.
  • Consistency: 74/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 31/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Izod/Charpy impact family: 3/100. Validate impact or shock-loaded components against their application requirements.
  • Stiffness: 41/100. Expect less shape stability than the stronger materials in the same family.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
  • The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

  • Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications
  • Avoid high impact components

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall38/10068 / 80Better than 16%
Tensile31/10094 / 243Better than 62%
Impact———
Izod4/10077 / 83Better than 8%
Charpy3/10076 / 82Better than 9%
Stiffness41/100230 / 240Better than 5%
Consistency74/100146 / 243Better than 40%
Layer adhesion41/10046 / 243Better than 81%
Thermal29/100116 / 226Better than 49%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
MAT0236Yasin Standard Black PETG CF BlackYasin47/10030/100—
MAT0198Siraya Tech Fiberheart Black PETG Pro CF BlackSiraya Tech46/10033/100—
MAT0235Yasin Standard Black PETG GF BlackYasin44/10027/100—

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
MAT0236Yasin Standard Black PETG CF BlackYasin47/10030/100—n/an/a
MAT0198Siraya Tech Fiberheart Black PETG Pro CF BlackSiraya Tech46/10033/100—n/an/a
MAT0235Yasin Standard Black PETG GF BlackYasin44/10027/100—n/an/a
MAT0048Prusa3D Prusament Jet Black PETG V0 BlackPrusa3D44/10026/100—n/an/a
MAT0042Prusa3D Prusament PETG CF BlackPrusa3D42/10025/100—n/an/a
MAT0043Prima Creator PrimaSelect PETG GF WhitePrima Creator40/10031/100—n/an/a
MAT0266Coex 3D Standard Banana Yellow PETG YellowCoex 3D40/10030/100—n/an/a
MAT0061Prusa3D Prusament Signal White PETG WhitePrusa3D39/10033/100—n/an/a

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.

Izod and Charpy Impact Strength

Charpy Impact Strength · 2026-10-01
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 2.122 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 0.784 kJ/m²; CV 36.937%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.

Izod Impact Strength · 2026-10-01
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 2.819 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 0.889 kJ/m²; CV 31.537%; Samples 8; Confidence 8
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.