3DPIceland Engineering Platform 3DPIceland Labs Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology Generated 2026-10-04 18:07:33
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Legacy Impact radar: —. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.
Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.
Fixture thermal result
— · score — · method — —
Material and manufacturer context
Metric
Selected material
Material average
Manufacturer average
Overall
—
—
—
Tensile
26/100
28/100
26/100
Impact
—
—
—
Izod
—
5/100
—
Charpy
—
4/100
—
Stiffness
40/100
60/100
40/100
Consistency
79/100
74/100
79/100
Layer adhesion
46/100
31/100
43/100
Thermal
—
—
—
Verified measurement results
Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.
Measurement
Average
Std. deviation
CV
Samples
Confidence
Tensile upright
13.074 MPa
3.784 MPa
28.9%
10
10/10
Tensile flat
28.255 MPa
3.81 MPa
13.5%
10
10/10
Impact upright
—
—
—
—
—
Impact flat
—
—
—
—
—
Izod
—
—
—
—
—
Charpy
—
—
—
—
—
Stiffness modulus
1186.574 MPa
—
—
—
—
Stiffness deflection
4.573 mm
—
—
—
—
Measurement provenance
Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.
Module
Measured date
Tensile
Not recorded
Impact
Not recorded
Izod
Not recorded
Charpy
Not recorded
Stiffness
Not recorded
Thermal
Not recorded
Engineering interpretation
Summary: IC3D Standard PETG Yellow has a profile awaiting complete scoring evidence. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Tensile.
Data-driven review: IC3D Standard PETG Yellow has incomplete scoring evidence or pending method references. Overall suitability and ranking are unavailable. Available scored axes can be inspected separately; missing scores do not establish weak material performance.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Tensile
Dataset position
—
—
Strengths
Layer adhesion: 46/100. Z-axis bonding is better than the material-family context.
Consistency: 79/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.
Limitations
Tensile: 26/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
Stiffness: 40/100. Expect less shape stability than the stronger materials in the same family.
Engineering trade-offs
Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
Recommended applications
Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
Avoid high tensile load applications
Metric rankings and percentiles
Metric
Score
Rank
Percentile
Overall
—
—
—
Tensile
26/100
155 / 243
Better than 37%
Impact
—
—
—
Izod
—
—
—
Charpy
—
—
—
Stiffness
40/100
233 / 240
Better than 3%
Consistency
79/100
92 / 243
Better than 63%
Layer adhesion
46/100
29 / 243
Better than 88%
Thermal
—
—
—
Decision guidance
Overall suitability is unavailable until the required measurements and method references are complete.
Do not choose it as a tensile-strength benchmark material.
Better alternatives
MaterialID
Material
Manufacturer
Overall
Tensile
Impact
Izod
Charpy
No stronger same-base-material alternatives were identified in the current governed dataset.
Peer context
Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.
Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.