Public engineering report

BambuLab Matte PLA Matte Black

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0070
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v60.0.6 WORKFLOW-RELIABILITY - Bug Fixes and Workflow Reliability
Generated 2026-08-25 19:02:26
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Test coverage
Complete
Engineering axes
6/6
Public MSRP
$43.92 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0070
MaterialBambuLab Matte PLA Matte Black
ManufacturerBambuLab
Product lineMatte
Base materialPLA
CategoryStandard
Variant / finishMatte
Reinforcement
ColorBlack

Governed engineering profile

Overall52/100
Tensile19/100
Impact38/100
Stiffness100/100
Consistency81/100
Layer adhesion23/100
Thermal26/100
Best available axisstiffness

Engineering score profile

Overall
52/100
Tensile
19/100
Impact
38/100
Stiffness
100/100
Consistency
81/100
Layer adhesion
23/100
Thermal
26/100

Engineering radar

TensileImpactStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PLA
Manufacturer average - BambuLab

All axes use existing governed 0–100 engineering scores. Missing axes are shown at zero and remain listed as n/a elsewhere in the report.

Fixture thermal result

52 °C · score 26/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall52/10050/10047/100
Tensile19/10029/10026/100
Impact38/10024/10031/100
Stiffness100/10087/10077/100
Consistency81/10079/10077/100
Layer adhesion23/10030/10024/100
Thermal26/100

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright5.614 MPa2.496 MPa44.5%88/10
Tensile flat23.994 MPa2.135 MPa8.9%1010/10
Impact upright77.055 kJ/m²6.665 kJ/m²8.7%1010/10
Impact flat675.49 kJ/m²67.882 kJ/m²10%1010/10
Stiffness modulus3075.204 MPa
Stiffness deflection1.765 mm

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: BambuLab Matte PLA Matte Black has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is above its material-family average by 2,1 points and above its manufacturer average by 5,2 points. Its strongest measured axis is Stiffness, while the weakest axis is Tensile.
Data-driven review: BambuLab Matte PLA Matte Black is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 74% overall, is roughly aligned with the material-family average, and is above the manufacturer average by 5,2 points. Its strongest engineering signal is Stiffness, while Tensile is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Stiffness
Main limitation
Tensile
Dataset position
Better than 74%
61 / 234

Strengths

  • Consistency: 81/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.
  • Impact: 38/100. Impact behavior is competitive against the material-family context.
  • Stiffness: 100/100. Stiffness is a relative advantage in this comparison group.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 19/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Impact: 38/100. Avoid high impact or shock-loaded components without additional validation.
  • Layer adhesion: 23/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
  • Stiffness is useful for shape stability, but impact tolerance is a separate limitation.

Recommended applications

  • Rigid brackets, fixtures and shape-stable prototypes
  • Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall52/10061 / 234Better than 74%
Tensile19/100195 / 226Better than 14%
Impact38/10051 / 226Better than 78%
Stiffness100/1001 / 223Better than 100%
Consistency81/10066 / 231Better than 72%
Layer adhesion23/100114 / 226Better than 50%
Thermal26/100155 / 209Better than 26%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT0069ProtoPasta HTPLA Blood of My Enemies PLA RedProtoPasta100/100
MAT0079Polymaker PolyLight PLA Pro BlackPolymaker65/10035/10052/100
MAT0109Polymaker PolyMax PLA BlackPolymaker64/10032/10062/100

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT0069ProtoPasta HTPLA Blood of My Enemies PLA RedProtoPasta100/100
MAT0079Polymaker PolyLight PLA Pro BlackPolymaker65/10035/10052/100
MAT0109Polymaker PolyMax PLA BlackPolymaker64/10032/10062/100
MAT0080Polymaker PolySonic PLA Pro BluePolymaker64/10030/10058/100
MAT0076BambuLab Tough+ PLA Tough+ BlackBambuLab63/10026/10059/100
MAT0108Polymaker PolyLight PLA BlackPolymaker61/10033/10014/100
MAT0074Winkle Matte PLA Matte RedWinkle60/10034/100
MAT0122Add:North Enhanced PLA ClearAdd:North59/10040/10010/100

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.