3DPIceland Engineering Platform 3DPIceland Labs Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology Generated 2026-10-04 18:07:33
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Legacy Impact radar: 5.464 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.
Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.
Fixture thermal result
52 °C · score 26/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1 Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.
Material and manufacturer context
Metric
Selected material
Material average
Manufacturer average
Overall
—
—
—
Tensile
32/100
30/100
25/100
Impact
—
—
—
Izod
—
8/100
11/100
Charpy
—
10/100
12/100
Stiffness
93/100
87/100
75/100
Consistency
81/100
75/100
72/100
Layer adhesion
11/100
31/100
19/100
Thermal
26/100
—
—
Verified measurement results
Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.
Measurement
Average
Std. deviation
CV
Samples
Confidence
Tensile upright
5.127 MPa
1.216 MPa
23.7%
9
9/10
Tensile flat
45.881 MPa
6.034 MPa
13.2%
10
10/10
Impact upright
0.961 kJ/m²
0.51 kJ/m²
53%
10
10/10
Impact flat
5.264 kJ/m²
1.223 kJ/m²
23.2%
10
10/10
Izod
—
—
—
—
—
Charpy
—
—
—
—
—
Stiffness modulus
2795.64 MPa
—
—
—
—
Stiffness deflection
1.941 mm
—
—
—
—
Measurement provenance
Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.
Module
Measured date
Tensile
Not recorded
Impact
Not recorded
Izod
Not recorded
Charpy
Not recorded
Stiffness
Not recorded
Thermal
Not recorded
Engineering interpretation
Summary: Yasin Standard Silk PLA Silk Pink has a profile awaiting complete scoring evidence. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Stiffness, while the weakest axis is Layer Adhesion.
Data-driven review: Yasin Standard Silk PLA Silk Pink has incomplete scoring evidence or pending method references. Overall suitability and ranking are unavailable. Available scored axes can be inspected separately; missing scores do not establish weak material performance.
Best feature
Stiffness
Main limitation
Layer Adhesion
Dataset position
—
—
Strengths
Consistency: 81/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.
Stiffness: 93/100. Stiffness is a relative advantage in this comparison group.
Limitations
Tensile: 32/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
Layer adhesion: 11/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.
Engineering trade-offs
Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
Recommended applications
Rigid brackets, fixtures and shape-stable prototypes
Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
Avoid high tensile load applications
Metric rankings and percentiles
Metric
Score
Rank
Percentile
Overall
—
—
—
Tensile
32/100
86 / 243
Better than 65%
Impact
—
—
—
Izod
—
—
—
Charpy
—
—
—
Stiffness
93/100
66 / 240
Better than 73%
Consistency
81/100
71 / 243
Better than 71%
Layer adhesion
11/100
204 / 243
Better than 16%
Thermal
26/100
168 / 226
Better than 26%
Decision guidance
Overall suitability is unavailable until the required measurements and method references are complete.
Do not choose it as a tensile-strength benchmark material.
Better alternatives
MaterialID
Material
Manufacturer
Overall
Tensile
Impact
Izod
Charpy
No stronger same-base-material alternatives were identified in the current governed dataset.
Peer context
Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.
Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.