Public engineering report

Yasin Standard Soft PLA PLA Soft White

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0094

3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
Generated 2026-10-04 18:07:33

Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.

Rigid test coverage

Partial; 4/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 2/2 measured, 2/2 scored; Overall unavailable: missing measurements or references; policy engineering-score-v70-1

Engineering axes

5/8

Public MSRP

$29.44 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialID	MAT0094
Material	Yasin Standard Soft PLA PLA Soft White
Manufacturer	Yasin
Product line	Standard
Base material	PLA
Category	Standard
Variant / finish	Soft
Reinforcement	—
Color	White

Governed engineering profile

Overall	—
Tensile	8/100
Impact	—
Izod	33/100
Charpy	49/100
Stiffness	—
Consistency	87/100
Layer adhesion	37/100
Thermal	—
Best available axis	consistency

Engineering score profile

Overall

—

Tensile

8/100

Impact

—

Izod

33/100

Charpy

49/100

Stiffness

—

Consistency

87/100

Layer adhesion

37/100

Thermal

—

Engineering radar

Selected material

Material average - PLA

Manufacturer average - Yasin

Legacy Impact radar: 38.798 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.

Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.

Fixture thermal result

— · score — · method —
—

Material and manufacturer context

Metric	Selected material	Material average	Manufacturer average
Overall	—	—	—
Tensile	8/100	30/100	25/100
Impact	—	—	—
Izod	33/100	8/100	11/100
Charpy	49/100	10/100	12/100
Stiffness	—	87/100	75/100
Consistency	87/100	75/100	72/100
Layer adhesion	37/100	31/100	19/100
Thermal	—	—	—

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

Measurement	Average	Std. deviation	CV	Samples	Confidence
Tensile upright	3.623 MPa	0.796 MPa	22%	9	9/10
Tensile flat	9.751 MPa	1.071 MPa	11%	10	10/10
Impact upright	7.985 kJ/m²	3.67 kJ/m²	46%	10	10/10
Impact flat	36.225 kJ/m²	3.575 kJ/m²	9.9%	10	10/10
Izod	26.715 kJ/m²	2.097 kJ/m²	7.9%	10	10/10
Charpy	39.349 kJ/m²	3.768 kJ/m²	9.6%	10	10/10
Stiffness modulus	—	—	—	—	—
Stiffness deflection	—	—	—	—	—

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

Module	Measured date
Tensile	Not recorded
Impact	Not recorded
Izod	2026-10-03
Charpy	2026-10-03
Stiffness	Not recorded
Thermal	Not recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Yasin Standard Soft PLA PLA Soft White has a profile awaiting complete scoring evidence. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Tensile.

Data-driven review: Yasin Standard Soft PLA PLA Soft White has incomplete scoring evidence or pending method references. Overall suitability and ranking are unavailable. Available scored axes can be inspected separately; missing scores do not establish weak material performance.

Best feature

Consistency

Main limitation

Tensile

Dataset position

—

Strengths

Layer adhesion: 37/100. Z-axis bonding is better than the material-family context.
Consistency: 87/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.
Izod/Charpy impact family: 41/100. The two-method impact score is competitive against the material-family context.

Limitations

Tensile: 8/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
Layer adhesion: 37/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.

Recommended applications

Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
Avoid high tensile load applications

Metric rankings and percentiles

Metric	Score	Rank	Percentile
Overall	—	—	—
Tensile	8/100	241 / 243	Better than 1%
Impact	—	—	—
Izod	33/100	3 / 83	Better than 98%
Charpy	49/100	3 / 82	Better than 98%
Stiffness	—	—	—
Consistency	87/100	17 / 243	Better than 93%
Layer adhesion	37/100	59 / 243	Better than 76%
Thermal	—	—	—

Decision guidance

Overall suitability is unavailable until the required measurements and method references are complete.
Do not choose it as a tensile-strength benchmark material.

Better alternatives

MaterialID	Material	Manufacturer	Overall	Tensile	Impact	Izod	Charpy
No stronger same-base-material alternatives were identified in the current governed dataset.

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialID	Material	Manufacturer	Overall	Tensile	Impact	Izod	Charpy
MAT0265	Coex 3D Standard Scarlet Red PLA Red	Coex 3D	58/100	39/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0118	Prusa3D Prusament Azure Blue PLA Blue	Prusa3D	55/100	36/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0112	Prusa3D Prusament Galaxy Black PLA Black	Prusa3D	52/100	38/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0143	Prusa3D Prusament Corn Pigment PLA Recycled Brown	Prusa3D	52/100	30/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0203	Prusa3D Prusament Prusa Orange PLA Orange	Prusa3D	52/100	42/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0264	Coex 3D Prime Scarlet Red PLA Red	Coex 3D	52/100	34/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0205	Prusa3D Prusament Marble Gray PLA Marble Gray	Prusa3D	51/100	37/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0204	Prusa3D Prusament Jet Black PLA Black	Prusa3D	51/100	40/100	—	n/a	n/a

Public links

Manufacturer website Video review Download PDF

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.

Flexible Material Testing

Comparative in-house measurements; n = independent specimens. Separate test groups; Overall unchanged.

Method	Result	Condition	Mean	n	SD	CV %	Range
eaacea91	Apparent Compressive Stress at 20% Strain (MPa)	10 s hold · 2 mm displacement · cycle 1	6.262	10	0.106	1.691	6.099–6.413
eaacea91	Apparent Compressive Stress at 20% Strain (MPa)	30 s hold · 2 mm displacement · cycle 1	6.046	10	0.095	1.571	5.879–6.193
eaacea91	Compression Force at 20% Strain (N)	10 s hold · 2 mm displacement · cycle 1	398.4	10	6.736	1.691	388–408
eaacea91	Compression Force at 20% Strain (N)	30 s hold · 2 mm displacement · cycle 1	384.6	10	6.041	1.571	374–394
eaacea91	Force reduction from 10 s to 30 s at 20% Strain (%)	first compression only · 2 mm displacement	3.462	10	0.302	8.737	2.813–3.769
eaacea91	Force retention at 20% Strain (%)	10–30 s · 2 mm displacement · cycle 1	96.538	10	0.302	0.313	96.231–97.187
eaacea91	Residual height loss after recovery (%)	20% compression · 30 s compressed hold · 60 s rest · 10 mm initial height · cycle 1	4.06	10	0.158	3.886	3.7–4.3
ed381ba8	Shore A Hardness (Shore A)	10 s reading · 8 mm	93	1	—	—	93–93

Shore location statistics

Within each specimen; specimen numbers are local to each test group. SD uses the sample formula. These readings do not increase independent n.

Method	Scale	Condition	Specimen	Readings	Mean	Location SD	Location CV %
ed381ba8	Shore A Hardness	10 s reading · 8 mm	1	5	93	2.031	2.184

Izod and Charpy Impact Strength

Charpy Impact Strength · 2026-10-03
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 39.349 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 3.768 kJ/m²; CV 9.576%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.

Izod Impact Strength · 2026-10-03
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 26.715 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 2.097 kJ/m²; CV 7.851%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.