Public engineering report

Polymaker PolyTerra PLA Plus Green

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0097
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
Generated 2026-10-04 18:07:33
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Rigid test coverage
Partial; 4/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 0/2 measured, 0/2 scored; Overall unavailable: missing measurements or references; policy engineering-score-v70-1
Engineering axes
4/8
Public MSRP
$21.73 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0097
MaterialPolymaker PolyTerra PLA Plus Green
ManufacturerPolymaker
Product linePolyTerra
Base materialPLA
CategoryStandard
Variant / finishPlus
Reinforcement—
ColorGreen

Governed engineering profile

Overall—
Tensile20/100
Impact—
Izod—
Charpy—
Stiffness68/100
Consistency73/100
Layer adhesion22/100
Thermal—
Best available axisconsistency

Engineering score profile

Overall
—
Tensile
20/100
Impact
—
Izod
—
Charpy
—
Stiffness
68/100
Consistency
73/100
Layer adhesion
22/100
Thermal
—

Engineering radar

TensileLegacy Impact %IzodCharpyStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PLA
Manufacturer average - Polymaker

Legacy Impact radar: 12.586 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.

Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.

Fixture thermal result

— · score — · method —
—

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall———
Tensile20/10030/10027/100
Impact———
Izod—8/100—
Charpy—10/100—
Stiffness68/10087/10076/100
Consistency73/10075/10081/100
Layer adhesion22/10031/10052/100
Thermal———

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright5.779 MPa1.898 MPa32.8%77/10
Tensile flat26.517 MPa4.374 MPa16.5%1010/10
Impact upright3.183 kJ/m²0.587 kJ/m²18.4%1010/10
Impact flat11.159 kJ/m²1.461 kJ/m²13.1%1010/10
Izod—————
Charpy—————
Stiffness modulus2050.136 MPa————
Stiffness deflection2.647 mm————

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
IzodNot recorded
CharpyNot recorded
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Polymaker PolyTerra PLA Plus Green has a profile awaiting complete scoring evidence. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Tensile.
Data-driven review: Polymaker PolyTerra PLA Plus Green has incomplete scoring evidence or pending method references. Overall suitability and ranking are unavailable. Available scored axes can be inspected separately; missing scores do not establish weak material performance.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Tensile
Dataset position
—
—

Strengths

  • Consistency: 73/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 20/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Stiffness: 68/100. Expect less shape stability than the stronger materials in the same family.
  • Layer adhesion: 22/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.

Recommended applications

  • Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall———
Tensile20/100197 / 243Better than 19%
Impact———
Izod———
Charpy———
Stiffness68/100161 / 240Better than 33%
Consistency73/100156 / 243Better than 36%
Layer adhesion22/100138 / 243Better than 44%
Thermal———

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
No stronger same-base-material alternatives were identified in the current governed dataset.

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
MAT0265Coex 3D Standard Scarlet Red PLA RedCoex 3D58/10039/100—n/an/a
MAT0118Prusa3D Prusament Azure Blue PLA BluePrusa3D55/10036/100—n/an/a
MAT0112Prusa3D Prusament Galaxy Black PLA BlackPrusa3D52/10038/100—n/an/a
MAT0143Prusa3D Prusament Corn Pigment PLA Recycled BrownPrusa3D52/10030/100—n/an/a
MAT0203Prusa3D Prusament Prusa Orange PLA OrangePrusa3D52/10042/100—n/an/a
MAT0264Coex 3D Prime Scarlet Red PLA RedCoex 3D52/10034/100—n/an/a
MAT0205Prusa3D Prusament Marble Gray PLA Marble GrayPrusa3D51/10037/100—n/an/a
MAT0204Prusa3D Prusament Jet Black PLA BlackPrusa3D51/10040/100—n/an/a

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.