Public engineering report

Polymaker PolyTerra PLA Plus Green

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0097
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v60.0.6 WORKFLOW-RELIABILITY - Bug Fixes and Workflow Reliability
Generated 2026-08-25 19:02:26
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Test coverage
Complete
Engineering axes
5/6
Public MSRP
$21.73 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0097
MaterialPolymaker PolyTerra PLA Plus Green
ManufacturerPolymaker
Product linePolyTerra
Base materialPLA
CategoryStandard
Variant / finishPlus
Reinforcement
ColorGreen

Governed engineering profile

Overall41/100
Tensile20/100
Impact15/100
Stiffness68/100
Consistency79/100
Layer adhesion22/100
Thermal
Best available axisconsistency

Engineering score profile

Overall
41/100
Tensile
20/100
Impact
15/100
Stiffness
68/100
Consistency
79/100
Layer adhesion
22/100
Thermal

Engineering radar

TensileImpactStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PLA
Manufacturer average - Polymaker

All axes use existing governed 0–100 engineering scores. Missing axes are shown at zero and remain listed as n/a elsewhere in the report.

Fixture thermal result

· score — · method —

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall41/10050/10054/100
Tensile20/10029/10027/100
Impact15/10024/10032/100
Stiffness68/10087/10076/100
Consistency79/10079/10084/100
Layer adhesion22/10030/10052/100
Thermal

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright5.779 MPa1.898 MPa32.8%77/10
Tensile flat26.517 MPa4.374 MPa16.5%1010/10
Impact upright66.091 kJ/m²12.185 kJ/m²18.4%1010/10
Impact flat231.702 kJ/m²30.328 kJ/m²13.1%1010/10
Stiffness modulus2050.136 MPa
Stiffness deflection2.647 mm

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Polymaker PolyTerra PLA Plus Green has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is below its material-family average by 9,3 points and below its manufacturer average by 13,4 points. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Impact.
Data-driven review: Polymaker PolyTerra PLA Plus Green is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 17% overall, is below the material-family average by 9,3 points, and is below the manufacturer average by 13,4 points. Its strongest engineering signal is Consistency, while Impact is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Impact
Dataset position
Better than 17%
195 / 234

Strengths

  • Consistency: 79/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 20/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Impact: 15/100. Avoid high impact or shock-loaded components without additional validation.
  • Stiffness: 68/100. Expect less shape stability than the stronger materials in the same family.
  • Layer adhesion: 22/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
  • The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

  • Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications
  • Avoid high impact components

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall41/100195 / 234Better than 17%
Tensile20/100183 / 226Better than 19%
Impact15/100180 / 226Better than 21%
Stiffness68/100150 / 223Better than 33%
Consistency79/100102 / 231Better than 56%
Layer adhesion22/100129 / 226Better than 43%
Thermal

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT0069ProtoPasta HTPLA Blood of My Enemies PLA RedProtoPasta100/100
MAT0079Polymaker PolyLight PLA Pro BlackPolymaker65/10035/10052/100
MAT0109Polymaker PolyMax PLA BlackPolymaker64/10032/10062/100

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT0069ProtoPasta HTPLA Blood of My Enemies PLA RedProtoPasta100/100
MAT0079Polymaker PolyLight PLA Pro BlackPolymaker65/10035/10052/100
MAT0109Polymaker PolyMax PLA BlackPolymaker64/10032/10062/100
MAT0080Polymaker PolySonic PLA Pro BluePolymaker64/10030/10058/100
MAT0076BambuLab Tough+ PLA Tough+ BlackBambuLab63/10026/10059/100
MAT0108Polymaker PolyLight PLA BlackPolymaker61/10033/10014/100
MAT0074Winkle Matte PLA Matte RedWinkle60/10034/100
MAT0122Add:North Enhanced PLA ClearAdd:North59/10040/10010/100

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.