Public engineering report

Prima Creator PrimaSelect Valvet Green PLA Metal Green

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0129
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v60.0.6 WORKFLOW-RELIABILITY - Bug Fixes and Workflow Reliability
Generated 2026-08-25 19:02:26
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Test coverage
Complete
Engineering axes
6/6
Public MSRP
$21.65 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0129
MaterialPrima Creator PrimaSelect Valvet Green PLA Metal Green
ManufacturerPrima Creator
Product linePrimaSelect
Base materialPLA
CategoryStandard
Variant / finishMetal
Reinforcement
ColorGreen

Governed engineering profile

Overall54/100
Tensile29/100
Impact54/100
Stiffness74/100
Consistency85/100
Layer adhesion30/100
Thermal29/100
Best available axisconsistency

Engineering score profile

Overall
54/100
Tensile
29/100
Impact
54/100
Stiffness
74/100
Consistency
85/100
Layer adhesion
30/100
Thermal
29/100

Engineering radar

TensileImpactStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PLA
Manufacturer average - Prima Creator

All axes use existing governed 0–100 engineering scores. Missing axes are shown at zero and remain listed as n/a elsewhere in the report.

Fixture thermal result

58 °C · score 29/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall54/10050/10047/100
Tensile29/10029/10027/100
Impact54/10024/10033/100
Stiffness74/10087/10076/100
Consistency85/10079/10078/100
Layer adhesion30/10030/10022/100
Thermal29/100

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright10.736 MPa4.566 MPa42.5%1010/10
Tensile flat36.299 MPa2.647 MPa7.3%1010/10
Impact upright168.172 kJ/m²8.518 kJ/m²5.1%1010/10
Impact flat914.202 kJ/m²38.01 kJ/m²4.2%1010/10
Stiffness modulus2223.039 MPa
Stiffness deflection2.441 mm

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Prima Creator PrimaSelect Valvet Green PLA Metal Green has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is above its material-family average by 4,4 points and above its manufacturer average by 7,2 points. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Tensile.
Data-driven review: Prima Creator PrimaSelect Valvet Green PLA Metal Green is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 84% overall, is above the material-family average by 4,4 points, and is above the manufacturer average by 7,2 points. Its strongest engineering signal is Consistency, while Tensile is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Tensile
Dataset position
Better than 84%
38 / 234

Strengths

  • Consistency: 85/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.
  • Impact: 54/100. Impact behavior is competitive against the material-family context.
  • Stiffness: 74/100. Stiffness is a relative advantage in this comparison group.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 29/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Stiffness: 74/100. Expect less shape stability than the stronger materials in the same family.
  • Layer adhesion: 30/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.

Recommended applications

  • Rigid brackets, fixtures and shape-stable prototypes
  • Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall54/10038 / 234Better than 84%
Tensile29/100108 / 226Better than 53%
Impact54/10014 / 226Better than 94%
Stiffness74/100128 / 223Better than 43%
Consistency85/10022 / 231Better than 91%
Layer adhesion30/10088 / 226Better than 62%
Thermal29/100102 / 209Better than 52%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT0069ProtoPasta HTPLA Blood of My Enemies PLA RedProtoPasta100/100
MAT0079Polymaker PolyLight PLA Pro BlackPolymaker65/10035/10052/100
MAT0109Polymaker PolyMax PLA BlackPolymaker64/10032/10062/100

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT0069ProtoPasta HTPLA Blood of My Enemies PLA RedProtoPasta100/100
MAT0079Polymaker PolyLight PLA Pro BlackPolymaker65/10035/10052/100
MAT0109Polymaker PolyMax PLA BlackPolymaker64/10032/10062/100
MAT0080Polymaker PolySonic PLA Pro BluePolymaker64/10030/10058/100
MAT0076BambuLab Tough+ PLA Tough+ BlackBambuLab63/10026/10059/100
MAT0108Polymaker PolyLight PLA BlackPolymaker61/10033/10014/100
MAT0074Winkle Matte PLA Matte RedWinkle60/10034/100
MAT0122Add:North Enhanced PLA ClearAdd:North59/10040/10010/100

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.