Public engineering report

Prusa3D Buddy3D PLA Glitter Green

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0132
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v60.0.6 WORKFLOW-RELIABILITY - Bug Fixes and Workflow Reliability
Generated 2026-08-25 19:02:26
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Test coverage
Complete
Engineering axes
6/6
Public MSRP
$21.60 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0132
MaterialPrusa3D Buddy3D PLA Glitter Green
ManufacturerPrusa3D
Product lineBuddy3D
Base materialPLA
CategoryStandard
Variant / finishGlitter
Reinforcement
ColorGreen

Governed engineering profile

Overall57/100
Tensile37/100
Impact20/100
Stiffness100/100
Consistency85/100
Layer adhesion46/100
Thermal28/100
Best available axisstiffness

Engineering score profile

Overall
57/100
Tensile
37/100
Impact
20/100
Stiffness
100/100
Consistency
85/100
Layer adhesion
46/100
Thermal
28/100

Engineering radar

TensileImpactStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PLA
Manufacturer average - Prusa3D

All axes use existing governed 0–100 engineering scores. Missing axes are shown at zero and remain listed as n/a elsewhere in the report.

Fixture thermal result

55 °C · score 28/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall57/10050/10049/100
Tensile37/10029/10031/100
Impact20/10024/10021/100
Stiffness100/10087/10084/100
Consistency85/10079/10079/100
Layer adhesion46/10030/10032/100
Thermal28/100

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright18.688 MPa4.315 MPa23.1%1010/10
Tensile flat40.821 MPa3.888 MPa9.5%1010/10
Impact upright172.48 kJ/m²26.228 kJ/m²15.2%1010/10
Impact flat225.683 kJ/m²31.432 kJ/m²13.9%1010/10
Stiffness modulus3416.893 MPa
Stiffness deflection1.588 mm

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Prusa3D Buddy3D PLA Glitter Green has a balanced mid-range engineering profile. It is above its material-family average by 7,4 points and above its manufacturer average by 8,1 points. Its strongest measured axis is Stiffness, while the weakest axis is Impact.
Data-driven review: Prusa3D Buddy3D PLA Glitter Green is best understood as a balanced material for general functional prototypes. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 94% overall, is above the material-family average by 7,4 points, and is above the manufacturer average by 8,1 points. Its strongest engineering signal is Stiffness, while Impact is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Stiffness
Main limitation
Impact
Dataset position
Better than 94%
15 / 234

Strengths

  • Layer adhesion: 46/100. Z-axis bonding is better than the material-family context.
  • Consistency: 85/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.
  • Tensile: 37/100. Tensile behavior is competitive against the material-family context.
  • Stiffness: 100/100. Stiffness is a relative advantage in this comparison group.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 37/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Impact: 20/100. Avoid high impact or shock-loaded components without additional validation.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
  • Stiffness is useful for shape stability, but impact tolerance is a separate limitation.

Recommended applications

  • Rigid brackets, fixtures and shape-stable prototypes
  • Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high impact components

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall57/10015 / 234Better than 94%
Tensile37/10025 / 226Better than 89%
Impact20/100132 / 226Better than 42%
Stiffness100/1001 / 223Better than 100%
Consistency85/10026 / 231Better than 89%
Layer adhesion46/10031 / 226Better than 87%
Thermal28/100113 / 209Better than 46%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT0069ProtoPasta HTPLA Blood of My Enemies PLA RedProtoPasta100/100
MAT0079Polymaker PolyLight PLA Pro BlackPolymaker65/10035/10052/100
MAT0109Polymaker PolyMax PLA BlackPolymaker64/10032/10062/100

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT0069ProtoPasta HTPLA Blood of My Enemies PLA RedProtoPasta100/100
MAT0079Polymaker PolyLight PLA Pro BlackPolymaker65/10035/10052/100
MAT0109Polymaker PolyMax PLA BlackPolymaker64/10032/10062/100
MAT0080Polymaker PolySonic PLA Pro BluePolymaker64/10030/10058/100
MAT0076BambuLab Tough+ PLA Tough+ BlackBambuLab63/10026/10059/100
MAT0108Polymaker PolyLight PLA BlackPolymaker61/10033/10014/100
MAT0074Winkle Matte PLA Matte RedWinkle60/10034/100
MAT0122Add:North Enhanced PLA ClearAdd:North59/10040/10010/100

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.