Public engineering report

Prusa3D Prusament Mistic Green PLA Green

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0133
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
Generated 2026-10-04 18:07:33
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Rigid test coverage
Complete; 5/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 2/2 measured, 2/2 scored; Overall eligible; policy engineering-score-v70-1
Engineering axes
7/8
Public MSRP
$25.60 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0133
MaterialPrusa3D Prusament Mistic Green PLA Green
ManufacturerPrusa3D
Product linePrusament
Base materialPLA
CategoryStandard
Variant / finish—
Reinforcement—
ColorGreen

Governed engineering profile

Overall46/100
Tensile38/100
Impact—
Izod9/100
Charpy4/100
Stiffness99/100
Consistency52/100
Layer adhesion36/100
Thermal22/100
Best available axisstiffness

Engineering score profile

Overall
46/100
Tensile
38/100
Impact
—
Izod
9/100
Charpy
4/100
Stiffness
99/100
Consistency
52/100
Layer adhesion
36/100
Thermal
22/100

Engineering radar

TensileLegacy Impact %IzodCharpyStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PLA
Manufacturer average - Prusa3D

Legacy Impact radar: 18.757 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.

Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.

Fixture thermal result

44 °C · score 22/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall46/100——
Tensile38/10030/10031/100
Impact———
Izod9/1008/1009/100
Charpy4/10010/10012/100
Stiffness99/10087/10084/100
Consistency52/10075/10076/100
Layer adhesion36/10031/10032/100
Thermal22/100——

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright16.181 MPa4.459 MPa27.6%1010/10
Tensile flat44.42 MPa5.654 MPa12.7%1010/10
Impact upright7.111 kJ/m²0.895 kJ/m²12.6%1010/10
Impact flat14.262 kJ/m²1.416 kJ/m²9.9%1010/10
Izod7.042 kJ/m²9.988 kJ/m²141.8%99/10
Charpy3.421 kJ/m²0.234 kJ/m²6.8%1010/10
Stiffness modulus2976.004 MPa————
Stiffness deflection1.823 mm————

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
Izod2026-10-02
Charpy2026-10-02
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Prusa3D Prusament Mistic Green PLA Green has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Stiffness, while the weakest axis is Charpy.
Data-driven review: Prusa3D Prusament Mistic Green PLA Green is best understood as a limited-use material that should be validated carefully before functional use. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 65% overall, is missing enough context for the material-family average, and is missing enough context for the manufacturer average. Its strongest engineering signal is Stiffness, while Charpy is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Stiffness
Main limitation
Charpy
Dataset position
Better than 65%
29 / 80

Strengths

  • Layer adhesion: 36/100. Z-axis bonding is better than the material-family context.
  • Tensile: 38/100. Tensile behavior is competitive against the material-family context.
  • Stiffness: 99/100. Stiffness is a relative advantage in this comparison group.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 38/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Izod/Charpy impact family: 7/100. Validate impact or shock-loaded components against their application requirements.
  • Consistency: 52/100. Repeatability may not be the best reason to choose this filament.
  • Layer adhesion: 36/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Stiffness is useful for shape stability, but impact tolerance is a separate limitation.
  • The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

  • Rigid brackets, fixtures and shape-stable prototypes
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high impact components

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall46/10029 / 80Better than 65%
Tensile38/10025 / 243Better than 90%
Impact———
Izod9/10035 / 83Better than 59%
Charpy4/10066 / 82Better than 21%
Stiffness99/10045 / 240Better than 82%
Consistency52/100236 / 243Better than 3%
Layer adhesion36/10061 / 243Better than 75%
Thermal22/100225 / 226Better than 1%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
MAT0265Coex 3D Standard Scarlet Red PLA RedCoex 3D58/10039/100—
MAT0118Prusa3D Prusament Azure Blue PLA BluePrusa3D55/10036/100—
MAT0112Prusa3D Prusament Galaxy Black PLA BlackPrusa3D52/10038/100—

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
MAT0265Coex 3D Standard Scarlet Red PLA RedCoex 3D58/10039/100—n/an/a
MAT0118Prusa3D Prusament Azure Blue PLA BluePrusa3D55/10036/100—n/an/a
MAT0112Prusa3D Prusament Galaxy Black PLA BlackPrusa3D52/10038/100—n/an/a
MAT0143Prusa3D Prusament Corn Pigment PLA Recycled BrownPrusa3D52/10030/100—n/an/a
MAT0203Prusa3D Prusament Prusa Orange PLA OrangePrusa3D52/10042/100—n/an/a
MAT0264Coex 3D Prime Scarlet Red PLA RedCoex 3D52/10034/100—n/an/a
MAT0205Prusa3D Prusament Marble Gray PLA Marble GrayPrusa3D51/10037/100—n/an/a
MAT0204Prusa3D Prusament Jet Black PLA BlackPrusa3D51/10040/100—n/an/a

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.

Izod and Charpy Impact Strength

Izod Impact Strength · 2026-10-02
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 7.042 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 9.988 kJ/m²; CV 141.822%; Samples 9; Confidence 9
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.

Charpy Impact Strength · 2026-10-02
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 3.421 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 0.234 kJ/m²; CV 6.83%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.