3DPIceland Engineering Platform 3DPIceland Labs Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology Generated 2026-10-04 18:07:33
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Legacy Impact radar: 13.919 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.
Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.
Fixture thermal result
54 °C · score 27/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1 Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.
Material and manufacturer context
Metric
Selected material
Material average
Manufacturer average
Overall
—
—
—
Tensile
35/100
30/100
25/100
Impact
—
—
—
Izod
—
8/100
—
Charpy
—
10/100
—
Stiffness
83/100
87/100
75/100
Consistency
68/100
75/100
69/100
Layer adhesion
25/100
31/100
21/100
Thermal
27/100
—
—
Verified measurement results
Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.
Measurement
Average
Std. deviation
CV
Samples
Confidence
Tensile upright
11.182 MPa
4.892 MPa
43.7%
10
10/10
Tensile flat
44.743 MPa
8.64 MPa
19.3%
10
10/10
Impact upright
5.468 kJ/m²
0.93 kJ/m²
17%
10
10/10
Impact flat
10.392 kJ/m²
1.996 kJ/m²
19.2%
9
9/10
Izod
—
—
—
—
—
Charpy
—
—
—
—
—
Stiffness modulus
2493.408 MPa
—
—
—
—
Stiffness deflection
2.176 mm
—
—
—
—
Measurement provenance
Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.
Module
Measured date
Tensile
Not recorded
Impact
Not recorded
Izod
Not recorded
Charpy
Not recorded
Stiffness
Not recorded
Thermal
Not recorded
Engineering interpretation
Summary: Thorwell Standard PLA Yellow has a profile awaiting complete scoring evidence. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Stiffness, while the weakest axis is Layer Adhesion.
Data-driven review: Thorwell Standard PLA Yellow has incomplete scoring evidence or pending method references. Overall suitability and ranking are unavailable. Available scored axes can be inspected separately; missing scores do not establish weak material performance.
Best feature
Stiffness
Main limitation
Layer Adhesion
Dataset position
—
—
Strengths
Tensile: 35/100. Tensile behavior is competitive against the material-family context.
Stiffness: 83/100. Stiffness is a relative advantage in this comparison group.
Limitations
Tensile: 35/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
Layer adhesion: 25/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.
Engineering trade-offs
Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
Recommended applications
Rigid brackets, fixtures and shape-stable prototypes
Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
Avoid high tensile load applications
Metric rankings and percentiles
Metric
Score
Rank
Percentile
Overall
—
—
—
Tensile
35/100
50 / 243
Better than 80%
Impact
—
—
—
Izod
—
—
—
Charpy
—
—
—
Stiffness
83/100
113 / 240
Better than 53%
Consistency
68/100
189 / 243
Better than 23%
Layer adhesion
25/100
115 / 243
Better than 53%
Thermal
27/100
130 / 226
Better than 43%
Decision guidance
Overall suitability is unavailable until the required measurements and method references are complete.
Do not choose it as a tensile-strength benchmark material.
Better alternatives
MaterialID
Material
Manufacturer
Overall
Tensile
Impact
Izod
Charpy
No stronger same-base-material alternatives were identified in the current governed dataset.
Peer context
Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.
Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.