Public engineering report

Prusa3D Prusament Linden Light PLA Wood Wood Brown

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0144
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v60.0.6 WORKFLOW-RELIABILITY - Bug Fixes and Workflow Reliability
Generated 2026-08-25 19:02:26
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Test coverage
Complete
Engineering axes
6/6
Public MSRP
$36.80 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0144
MaterialPrusa3D Prusament Linden Light PLA Wood Wood Brown
ManufacturerPrusa3D
Product linePrusament
Base materialPLA
CategoryStandard
Variant / finishWood
ReinforcementWood
ColorBrown

Governed engineering profile

Overall37/100
Tensile15/100
Impact17/100
Stiffness57/100
Consistency79/100
Layer adhesion17/100
Thermal27/100
Best available axisconsistency

Engineering score profile

Overall
37/100
Tensile
15/100
Impact
17/100
Stiffness
57/100
Consistency
79/100
Layer adhesion
17/100
Thermal
27/100

Engineering radar

TensileImpactStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PLA
Manufacturer average - Prusa3D

All axes use existing governed 0–100 engineering scores. Missing axes are shown at zero and remain listed as n/a elsewhere in the report.

Fixture thermal result

53 °C · score 27/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall37/10050/10049/100
Tensile15/10029/10031/100
Impact17/10024/10021/100
Stiffness57/10087/10084/100
Consistency79/10079/10079/100
Layer adhesion17/10030/10032/100
Thermal27/100

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright3.634 MPa1.689 MPa46.5%88/10
Tensile flat20.856 MPa1.962 MPa9.4%1010/10
Impact upright91.451 kJ/m²11.603 kJ/m²12.7%1010/10
Impact flat258.342 kJ/m²28.991 kJ/m²11.2%1010/10
Stiffness modulus1708.447 MPa
Stiffness deflection3.176 mm

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Prusa3D Prusament Linden Light PLA Wood Wood Brown has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is below its material-family average by 12,8 points and below its manufacturer average by 12,1 points. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Tensile.
Data-driven review: Prusa3D Prusament Linden Light PLA Wood Wood Brown is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 7% overall, is below the material-family average by 12,8 points, and is below the manufacturer average by 12,1 points. Its strongest engineering signal is Consistency, while Tensile is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Tensile
Dataset position
Better than 7%
218 / 234

Strengths

  • Consistency: 79/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 15/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Impact: 17/100. Avoid high impact or shock-loaded components without additional validation.
  • Stiffness: 57/100. Expect less shape stability than the stronger materials in the same family.
  • Layer adhesion: 17/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
  • The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

  • Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications
  • Avoid high impact components

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall37/100218 / 234Better than 7%
Tensile15/100210 / 226Better than 8%
Impact17/100162 / 226Better than 29%
Stiffness57/100192 / 223Better than 14%
Consistency79/10093 / 231Better than 60%
Layer adhesion17/100148 / 226Better than 35%
Thermal27/100131 / 209Better than 38%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT0069ProtoPasta HTPLA Blood of My Enemies PLA RedProtoPasta100/100
MAT0079Polymaker PolyLight PLA Pro BlackPolymaker65/10035/10052/100
MAT0109Polymaker PolyMax PLA BlackPolymaker64/10032/10062/100

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT0069ProtoPasta HTPLA Blood of My Enemies PLA RedProtoPasta100/100
MAT0079Polymaker PolyLight PLA Pro BlackPolymaker65/10035/10052/100
MAT0109Polymaker PolyMax PLA BlackPolymaker64/10032/10062/100
MAT0080Polymaker PolySonic PLA Pro BluePolymaker64/10030/10058/100
MAT0076BambuLab Tough+ PLA Tough+ BlackBambuLab63/10026/10059/100
MAT0108Polymaker PolyLight PLA BlackPolymaker61/10033/10014/100
MAT0074Winkle Matte PLA Matte RedWinkle60/10034/100
MAT0122Add:North Enhanced PLA ClearAdd:North59/10040/10010/100

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.