Public engineering report

Thorwell Standard HIPS HIPS Blue

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0146
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
Generated 2026-10-04 18:07:33
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Rigid test coverage
Partial; 4/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 0/2 measured, 0/2 scored; Overall unavailable: missing measurements or references; policy engineering-score-v70-1
Engineering axes
5/8
Public MSRP
$32.00 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0146
MaterialThorwell Standard HIPS HIPS Blue
ManufacturerThorwell
Product lineStandard
Base materialHIPS
CategoryEngineering
Variant / finish—
Reinforcement—
ColorBlue

Governed engineering profile

Overall—
Tensile14/100
Impact—
Izod—
Charpy—
Stiffness63/100
Consistency67/100
Layer adhesion11/100
Thermal38/100
Best available axisconsistency

Engineering score profile

Overall
—
Tensile
14/100
Impact
—
Izod
—
Charpy
—
Stiffness
63/100
Consistency
67/100
Layer adhesion
11/100
Thermal
38/100

Engineering radar

TensileLegacy Impact %IzodCharpyStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - HIPS
Manufacturer average - Thorwell

Legacy Impact radar: 31.098 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.

Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.

Fixture thermal result

76 °C · score 38/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall———
Tensile14/10013/10025/100
Impact———
Izod———
Charpy———
Stiffness63/10064/10075/100
Consistency67/10062/10069/100
Layer adhesion11/10011/10021/100
Thermal38/100——

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright2.192 MPa0.715 MPa32.6%44/10
Tensile flat19.995 MPa4.734 MPa23.7%1010/10
Impact upright5.932 kJ/m²1.694 kJ/m²28.5%88/10
Impact flat29.502 kJ/m²1.904 kJ/m²6.5%1010/10
Izod—————
Charpy—————
Stiffness modulus1882.778 MPa————
Stiffness deflection2.882 mm————

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
IzodNot recorded
CharpyNot recorded
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Thorwell Standard HIPS HIPS Blue has a profile awaiting complete scoring evidence. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Layer Adhesion.
Data-driven review: Thorwell Standard HIPS HIPS Blue has incomplete scoring evidence or pending method references. Overall suitability and ranking are unavailable. Available scored axes can be inspected separately; missing scores do not establish weak material performance.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Layer Adhesion
Dataset position
—
—

Strengths

  • Best available signal: Consistency at 67/100.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 14/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Layer adhesion: 11/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.

Recommended applications

  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall———
Tensile14/100236 / 243Better than 3%
Impact———
Izod———
Charpy———
Stiffness63/100191 / 240Better than 21%
Consistency67/100196 / 243Better than 20%
Layer adhesion11/100208 / 243Better than 15%
Thermal38/10062 / 226Better than 73%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
No stronger same-base-material alternatives were identified in the current governed dataset.

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
MAT0240Yasin Standard White HIPS WhiteYasin—12/100—n/an/a

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.