Public engineering report

Thorwell Standard Silk PLA Silk Blue

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0147
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
Generated 2026-10-04 18:07:33
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Rigid test coverage
Partial; 4/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 0/2 measured, 0/2 scored; Overall unavailable: missing measurements or references; policy engineering-score-v70-1
Engineering axes
5/8
Public MSRP
$32.00 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0147
MaterialThorwell Standard Silk PLA Silk Blue
ManufacturerThorwell
Product lineStandard
Base materialPLA
CategoryStandard
Variant / finishSilk
Reinforcement—
ColorBlue

Governed engineering profile

Overall—
Tensile12/100
Impact—
Izod—
Charpy—
Stiffness43/100
Consistency68/100
Layer adhesion21/100
Thermal26/100
Best available axisconsistency

Engineering score profile

Overall
—
Tensile
12/100
Impact
—
Izod
—
Charpy
—
Stiffness
43/100
Consistency
68/100
Layer adhesion
21/100
Thermal
26/100

Engineering radar

TensileLegacy Impact %IzodCharpyStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PLA
Manufacturer average - Thorwell

Legacy Impact radar: 11.901 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.

Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.

Fixture thermal result

51 °C · score 26/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall———
Tensile12/10030/10025/100
Impact———
Izod—8/100—
Charpy—10/100—
Stiffness43/10087/10075/100
Consistency68/10075/10069/100
Layer adhesion21/10031/10021/100
Thermal26/100——

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright3.23 MPa1.088 MPa33.7%66/10
Tensile flat15.319 MPa3.633 MPa23.7%1010/10
Impact upright3.311 kJ/m²1.791 kJ/m²54.1%1010/10
Impact flat10.25 kJ/m²2.046 kJ/m²20%1010/10
Izod—————
Charpy—————
Stiffness modulus1299.382 MPa————
Stiffness deflection4.176 mm————

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
IzodNot recorded
CharpyNot recorded
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Thorwell Standard Silk PLA Silk Blue has a profile awaiting complete scoring evidence. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Tensile.
Data-driven review: Thorwell Standard Silk PLA Silk Blue has incomplete scoring evidence or pending method references. Overall suitability and ranking are unavailable. Available scored axes can be inspected separately; missing scores do not establish weak material performance.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Tensile
Dataset position
—
—

Strengths

  • Best available signal: Consistency at 68/100.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 12/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Stiffness: 43/100. Expect less shape stability than the stronger materials in the same family.
  • Layer adhesion: 21/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.

Recommended applications

  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall———
Tensile12/100240 / 243Better than 2%
Impact———
Izod———
Charpy———
Stiffness43/100227 / 240Better than 6%
Consistency68/100190 / 243Better than 22%
Layer adhesion21/100145 / 243Better than 41%
Thermal26/100190 / 226Better than 16%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
No stronger same-base-material alternatives were identified in the current governed dataset.

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
MAT0265Coex 3D Standard Scarlet Red PLA RedCoex 3D58/10039/100—n/an/a
MAT0118Prusa3D Prusament Azure Blue PLA BluePrusa3D55/10036/100—n/an/a
MAT0112Prusa3D Prusament Galaxy Black PLA BlackPrusa3D52/10038/100—n/an/a
MAT0143Prusa3D Prusament Corn Pigment PLA Recycled BrownPrusa3D52/10030/100—n/an/a
MAT0203Prusa3D Prusament Prusa Orange PLA OrangePrusa3D52/10042/100—n/an/a
MAT0264Coex 3D Prime Scarlet Red PLA RedCoex 3D52/10034/100—n/an/a
MAT0205Prusa3D Prusament Marble Gray PLA Marble GrayPrusa3D51/10037/100—n/an/a
MAT0204Prusa3D Prusament Jet Black PLA BlackPrusa3D51/10040/100—n/an/a

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.