Public engineering report

BambuLab Basic PA12 PAHT CF Black

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0167
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
Generated 2026-10-04 18:07:33
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Rigid test coverage
Complete; 5/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 2/2 measured, 2/2 scored; Overall eligible; policy engineering-score-v70-1
Engineering axes
7/8
Public MSRP
$159.84 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0167
MaterialBambuLab Basic PA12 PAHT CF Black
ManufacturerBambuLab
Product lineBasic
Base materialPA12
CategoryEngineering
Variant / finishPAHT
ReinforcementCF
ColorBlack

Governed engineering profile

Overall48/100
Tensile39/100
Impact—
Izod21/100
Charpy22/100
Stiffness87/100
Consistency82/100
Layer adhesion9/100
Thermal68/100
Best available axisstiffness

Engineering score profile

Overall
48/100
Tensile
39/100
Impact
—
Izod
21/100
Charpy
22/100
Stiffness
87/100
Consistency
82/100
Layer adhesion
9/100
Thermal
68/100

Engineering radar

TensileLegacy Impact %IzodCharpyStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PA12
Manufacturer average - BambuLab

Legacy Impact radar: 34.63 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.

Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.

Fixture thermal result

136 °C · score 68/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall48/100——
Tensile39/10032/10026/100
Impact———
Izod21/10015/10011/100
Charpy22/10015/10012/100
Stiffness87/10054/10077/100
Consistency82/10081/10074/100
Layer adhesion9/10021/10024/100
Thermal68/100——

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright5.045 MPa2.367 MPa46.9%1010/10
Tensile flat56.663 MPa9.575 MPa16.9%1010/10
Impact upright6.329 kJ/m²0.648 kJ/m²10.2%1010/10
Impact flat33.13 kJ/m²2.76 kJ/m²8.3%1010/10
Izod16.462 kJ/m²0.508 kJ/m²3.1%1010/10
Charpy17.214 kJ/m²0.625 kJ/m²3.6%1010/10
Stiffness modulus2598.764 MPa————
Stiffness deflection2.088 mm————

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
Izod2026-10-04
Charpy2026-10-04
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: BambuLab Basic PA12 PAHT CF Black has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Stiffness, while the weakest axis is Layer Adhesion.
Data-driven review: BambuLab Basic PA12 PAHT CF Black is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 69% overall, is missing enough context for the material-family average, and is missing enough context for the manufacturer average. Its strongest engineering signal is Stiffness, while Layer Adhesion is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Stiffness
Main limitation
Layer Adhesion
Dataset position
Better than 69%
26 / 80

Strengths

  • Consistency: 82/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.
  • Izod/Charpy impact family: 21/100. The two-method impact score is competitive against the material-family context.
  • Tensile: 39/100. Tensile behavior is competitive against the material-family context.
  • Stiffness: 87/100. Stiffness is a relative advantage in this comparison group.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 39/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Izod/Charpy impact family: 21/100. Validate impact or shock-loaded components against their application requirements.
  • Layer adhesion: 9/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
  • Stiffness is useful for shape stability, but impact tolerance is a separate limitation.
  • The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

  • Rigid brackets, fixtures and shape-stable prototypes
  • Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high impact components

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall48/10026 / 80Better than 69%
Tensile39/10019 / 243Better than 93%
Impact———
Izod21/1009 / 83Better than 90%
Charpy22/10016 / 82Better than 82%
Stiffness87/10097 / 240Better than 60%
Consistency82/10048 / 243Better than 81%
Layer adhesion9/100232 / 243Better than 5%
Thermal68/1007 / 226Better than 97%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
No stronger same-base-material alternatives were identified in the current governed dataset.

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
MAT0214Eryone Standard Black PA12 CF BlackEryone48/10043/100—n/an/a
MAT0019MatterHackers NylonX PA12 CF BlackMatterHackers43/10032/100—n/an/a
MAT0209Eryone Standard Black PA12 GF BlackEryone41/10033/100—n/an/a
MAT0239Yasin Standard Black PA12 CF BlackYasin39/10033/100—n/an/a
MAT0196Extrudr DuraPro Black PA12 CF BlackExtrudr34/10028/100—n/an/a
MAT0020Extrudr DuraPro PA12 BlackExtrudr—34/100—n/an/a
MAT0022Fillamentum FX256 PA12 ClearFillamentum—28/100—n/an/a
MAT0021Yasin Standard Black PA12 BlackYasin—22/100—n/an/a

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.

Izod and Charpy Impact Strength

Charpy Impact Strength · 2026-10-04
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 17.214 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 0.625 kJ/m²; CV 3.632%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.

Izod Impact Strength · 2026-10-04
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 16.462 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 0.508 kJ/m²; CV 3.085%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.