Public engineering report

Eryone Standard White ASA GF White

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0218

3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
Generated 2026-10-04 18:07:33

Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.

Rigid test coverage

Complete; 5/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 2/2 measured, 2/2 scored; Overall eligible; policy engineering-score-v70-1

Engineering axes

7/8

Public MSRP

$16.50 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialID	MAT0218
Material	Eryone Standard White ASA GF White
Manufacturer	Eryone
Product line	Standard
Base material	ASA
Category	Engineering
Variant / finish	—
Reinforcement	GF
Color	White

Governed engineering profile

Overall	40/100
Tensile	17/100
Impact	—
Izod	9/100
Charpy	9/100
Stiffness	82/100
Consistency	55/100
Layer adhesion	39/100
Thermal	37/100
Best available axis	stiffness

Engineering score profile

Overall

40/100

Tensile

17/100

Impact

—

Izod

9/100

Charpy

9/100

Stiffness

82/100

Consistency

55/100

Layer adhesion

39/100

Thermal

37/100

Engineering radar

Selected material

Material average - ASA

Manufacturer average - Eryone

Legacy Impact radar: 23.278 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.

Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.

Fixture thermal result

74 °C · score 37/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

Metric	Selected material	Material average	Manufacturer average
Overall	40/100	—	—
Tensile	17/100	19/100	24/100
Impact	—	—	—
Izod	9/100	17/100	16/100
Charpy	9/100	30/100	18/100
Stiffness	82/100	68/100	73/100
Consistency	55/100	71/100	70/100
Layer adhesion	39/100	20/100	21/100
Thermal	37/100	—	—

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

Measurement	Average	Std. deviation	CV	Samples	Confidence
Tensile upright	7.629 MPa	9.61 MPa	126%	10	10/10
Tensile flat	19.414 MPa	8.403 MPa	43.3%	9	9/10
Impact upright	8.76 kJ/m²	0.559 kJ/m²	6.4%	10	10/10
Impact flat	17.765 kJ/m²	1.129 kJ/m²	6.4%	10	10/10
Izod	7 kJ/m²	0.271 kJ/m²	3.9%	10	10/10
Charpy	6.98 kJ/m²	0.169 kJ/m²	2.4%	9	9/10
Stiffness modulus	2460.163 MPa	—	—	—	—
Stiffness deflection	2.206 mm	—	—	—	—

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

Module	Measured date
Tensile	2026-08-01
Impact	2026-08-01
Izod	2026-10-02
Charpy	2026-10-02
Stiffness	2026-07-31
Thermal	Not recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Eryone Standard White ASA GF White has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Stiffness, while the weakest axis is Charpy.

Data-driven review: Eryone Standard White ASA GF White is best understood as a limited-use material that should be validated carefully before functional use. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 31% overall, is missing enough context for the material-family average, and is missing enough context for the manufacturer average. Its strongest engineering signal is Stiffness, while Charpy is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.

Best feature

Stiffness

Main limitation

Charpy

Dataset position

Better than 31%

56 / 80

Strengths

Layer adhesion: 39/100. Z-axis bonding is better than the material-family context.
Stiffness: 82/100. Stiffness is a relative advantage in this comparison group.

Limitations

Tensile: 17/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
Izod/Charpy impact family: 9/100. Validate impact or shock-loaded components against their application requirements.
Consistency: 55/100. Repeatability may not be the best reason to choose this filament.
Layer adhesion: 39/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

Stiffness is useful for shape stability, but impact tolerance is a separate limitation.
The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

Rigid brackets, fixtures and shape-stable prototypes
Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
Avoid high tensile load applications
Avoid high impact components

Metric rankings and percentiles

Metric	Score	Rank	Percentile
Overall	40/100	56 / 80	Better than 31%
Tensile	17/100	219 / 243	Better than 10%
Impact	—	—	—
Izod	9/100	37 / 83	Better than 57%
Charpy	9/100	38 / 82	Better than 55%
Stiffness	82/100	117 / 240	Better than 52%
Consistency	55/100	231 / 243	Better than 5%
Layer adhesion	39/100	53 / 243	Better than 79%
Thermal	37/100	66 / 226	Better than 71%

Decision guidance

Use this material mainly for low-load, visual or experimental parts.
Review the listed alternatives if the application needs stronger overall performance.
Do not choose it as a tensile-strength benchmark material.
Validate impact-focused or shock-loaded designs against the measured Izod/Charpy results.

Better alternatives

MaterialID	Material	Manufacturer	Overall	Tensile	Impact	Izod	Charpy
MAT0015	Prusa3D Prusament ASA Pro Green	Prusa3D	48/100	23/100	—

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialID	Material	Manufacturer	Overall	Tensile	Impact	Izod	Charpy
MAT0015	Prusa3D Prusament ASA Pro Green	Prusa3D	48/100	23/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0197	Siraya Tech Fiberheart Black ASA GF Black	Siraya Tech	43/100	21/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0010	Yasin Standard Black ASA GF Black	Yasin	42/100	21/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0012	Prusa3D Prusament Galaxy Black ASA Black	Prusa3D	41/100	18/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0011	Extrudr DuraPro Neon Green ASA GF Green	Extrudr	40/100	15/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0009	Yasin Standard Black ASA CF Black	Yasin	40/100	20/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0008	Extrudr DuraPro ASA CF Black	Extrudr	39/100	15/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0213	Eryone Standard Black ASA CF Black	Eryone	38/100	13/100	—	n/a	n/a

Public links

Manufacturer website Download PDF

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.

Izod and Charpy Impact Strength

Charpy Impact Strength · 2026-10-02
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 6.98 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 0.169 kJ/m²; CV 2.423%; Samples 9; Confidence 9
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.

Izod Impact Strength · 2026-10-02
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 7 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 0.271 kJ/m²; CV 3.864%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.