3DPIceland Engineering Platform 3DPIceland Labs Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology Generated 2026-10-04 18:07:33
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Legacy Impact radar: 14.772 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.
Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.
Fixture thermal result
53 °C · score 27/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1 Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.
Material and manufacturer context
Metric
Selected material
Material average
Manufacturer average
Overall
—
—
—
Tensile
40/100
30/100
31/100
Impact
—
—
—
Izod
—
8/100
9/100
Charpy
—
10/100
12/100
Stiffness
100/100
87/100
84/100
Consistency
75/100
75/100
76/100
Layer adhesion
36/100
31/100
32/100
Thermal
27/100
—
—
Verified measurement results
Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.
Measurement
Average
Std. deviation
CV
Samples
Confidence
Tensile upright
16.934 MPa
6.204 MPa
36.6%
10
10/10
Tensile flat
47.142 MPa
6.295 MPa
13.4%
10
10/10
Impact upright
5.715 kJ/m²
1.213 kJ/m²
21.2%
10
10/10
Impact flat
11.117 kJ/m²
0.8 kJ/m²
7.2%
10
10/10
Izod
—
—
—
—
—
Charpy
—
—
—
—
—
Stiffness modulus
3237.057 MPa
—
—
—
—
Stiffness deflection
1.676 mm
—
—
—
—
Measurement provenance
Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.
Module
Measured date
Tensile
2026-08-04
Impact
2026-08-04
Izod
Not recorded
Charpy
Not recorded
Stiffness
2026-08-04
Thermal
Not recorded
Engineering interpretation
Summary: Prusa3D Buddy3D Dark Green PLA Glitter Green has a profile awaiting complete scoring evidence. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Stiffness, while the weakest axis is Thermal.
Data-driven review: Prusa3D Buddy3D Dark Green PLA Glitter Green has incomplete scoring evidence or pending method references. Overall suitability and ranking are unavailable. Available scored axes can be inspected separately; missing scores do not establish weak material performance.
Best feature
Stiffness
Main limitation
Thermal
Dataset position
—
—
Strengths
Layer adhesion: 36/100. Z-axis bonding is better than the material-family context.
Consistency: 75/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.
Tensile: 40/100. Tensile behavior is competitive against the material-family context.
Stiffness: 100/100. Stiffness is a relative advantage in this comparison group.
Limitations
Layer adhesion: 36/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.
Engineering trade-offs
Complete scoring evidence and approved method references are required before assessing an overall balance of properties.
Recommended applications
Rigid brackets, fixtures and shape-stable prototypes
Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
Metric rankings and percentiles
Metric
Score
Rank
Percentile
Overall
—
—
—
Tensile
40/100
11 / 243
Better than 96%
Impact
—
—
—
Izod
—
—
—
Charpy
—
—
—
Stiffness
100/100
1 / 240
Better than 100%
Consistency
75/100
136 / 243
Better than 44%
Layer adhesion
36/100
62 / 243
Better than 75%
Thermal
27/100
143 / 226
Better than 37%
Decision guidance
Overall suitability is unavailable until the required measurements and method references are complete.
Better alternatives
MaterialID
Material
Manufacturer
Overall
Tensile
Impact
Izod
Charpy
No stronger same-base-material alternatives were identified in the current governed dataset.
Peer context
Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.
Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.