Public engineering report

Prusa3D Buddy3D PLA Silk Blue

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0223
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
Generated 2026-10-04 18:07:33
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Rigid test coverage
Partial; 4/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 0/2 measured, 0/2 scored; Overall unavailable: missing measurements or references; policy engineering-score-v70-1
Engineering axes
5/8
Public MSRP
$21.60 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0223
MaterialPrusa3D Buddy3D PLA Silk Blue
ManufacturerPrusa3D
Product lineBuddy3D
Base materialPLA
CategoryStandard
Variant / finishSilk
Reinforcement—
ColorBlue

Governed engineering profile

Overall—
Tensile24/100
Impact—
Izod—
Charpy—
Stiffness95/100
Consistency56/100
Layer adhesion15/100
Thermal27/100
Best available axisstiffness

Engineering score profile

Overall
—
Tensile
24/100
Impact
—
Izod
—
Charpy
—
Stiffness
95/100
Consistency
56/100
Layer adhesion
15/100
Thermal
27/100

Engineering radar

TensileLegacy Impact %IzodCharpyStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PLA
Manufacturer average - Prusa3D

Legacy Impact radar: 16.223 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.

Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.

Fixture thermal result

53 °C · score 27/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall———
Tensile24/10030/10031/100
Impact———
Izod—8/1009/100
Charpy—10/10012/100
Stiffness95/10087/10084/100
Consistency56/10075/10076/100
Layer adhesion15/10031/10032/100
Thermal27/100——

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright5.122 MPa3.075 MPa60%1010/10
Tensile flat33.992 MPa9.796 MPa28.8%1010/10
Impact upright5.795 kJ/m²0.582 kJ/m²10%1010/10
Impact flat12.69 kJ/m²1.051 kJ/m²8.3%1010/10
Izod—————
Charpy—————
Stiffness modulus2838.65 MPa————
Stiffness deflection1.912 mm————

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
Tensile2026-08-04
Impact2026-08-04
IzodNot recorded
CharpyNot recorded
Stiffness2026-08-04
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Prusa3D Buddy3D PLA Silk Blue has a profile awaiting complete scoring evidence. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Stiffness, while the weakest axis is Layer Adhesion.
Data-driven review: Prusa3D Buddy3D PLA Silk Blue has incomplete scoring evidence or pending method references. Overall suitability and ranking are unavailable. Available scored axes can be inspected separately; missing scores do not establish weak material performance.
Best feature
Stiffness
Main limitation
Layer Adhesion
Dataset position
—
—

Strengths

  • Stiffness: 95/100. Stiffness is a relative advantage in this comparison group.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 24/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Consistency: 56/100. Repeatability may not be the best reason to choose this filament.
  • Layer adhesion: 15/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Complete scoring evidence and approved method references are required before assessing an overall balance of properties.

Recommended applications

  • Rigid brackets, fixtures and shape-stable prototypes
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall———
Tensile24/100166 / 243Better than 32%
Impact———
Izod———
Charpy———
Stiffness95/10063 / 240Better than 74%
Consistency56/100230 / 243Better than 6%
Layer adhesion15/100181 / 243Better than 26%
Thermal27/100143 / 226Better than 37%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
No stronger same-base-material alternatives were identified in the current governed dataset.

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
MAT0265Coex 3D Standard Scarlet Red PLA RedCoex 3D58/10039/100—n/an/a
MAT0118Prusa3D Prusament Azure Blue PLA BluePrusa3D55/10036/100—n/an/a
MAT0112Prusa3D Prusament Galaxy Black PLA BlackPrusa3D52/10038/100—n/an/a
MAT0143Prusa3D Prusament Corn Pigment PLA Recycled BrownPrusa3D52/10030/100—n/an/a
MAT0203Prusa3D Prusament Prusa Orange PLA OrangePrusa3D52/10042/100—n/an/a
MAT0264Coex 3D Prime Scarlet Red PLA RedCoex 3D52/10034/100—n/an/a
MAT0205Prusa3D Prusament Marble Gray PLA Marble GrayPrusa3D51/10037/100—n/an/a
MAT0204Prusa3D Prusament Jet Black PLA BlackPrusa3D51/10040/100—n/an/a

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.