Public engineering report

Yasin Standard Natural POM Natural

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0232
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
Generated 2026-10-04 18:07:33
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Rigid test coverage
Partial; 4/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 0/2 measured, 0/2 scored; Overall unavailable: missing measurements or references; policy engineering-score-v70-1
Engineering axes
5/8
Public MSRP
$36.64 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0232
MaterialYasin Standard Natural POM Natural
ManufacturerYasin
Product lineStandard
Base materialPOM
CategorySpecialty
Variant / finish—
Reinforcement—
ColorNatural

Governed engineering profile

Overall—
Tensile29/100
Impact—
Izod—
Charpy—
Stiffness63/100
Consistency70/100
Layer adhesion31/100
Thermal51/100
Best available axisconsistency

Engineering score profile

Overall
—
Tensile
29/100
Impact
—
Izod
—
Charpy
—
Stiffness
63/100
Consistency
70/100
Layer adhesion
31/100
Thermal
51/100

Engineering radar

TensileLegacy Impact %IzodCharpyStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - POM
Manufacturer average - Yasin

Legacy Impact radar: 40.558 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.

Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.

Fixture thermal result

101 °C · score 51/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall———
Tensile29/10029/10025/100
Impact———
Izod——11/100
Charpy——12/100
Stiffness63/10063/10075/100
Consistency70/10070/10072/100
Layer adhesion31/10031/10019/100
Thermal51/100——

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright10.782 MPa4.594 MPa42.6%1010/10
Tensile flat35.345 MPa6.43 MPa18.2%1010/10
Impact upright3.268 kJ/m²1.475 kJ/m²45.1%1010/10
Impact flat42.947 kJ/m²5.097 kJ/m²11.9%1010/10
Izod—————
Charpy—————
Stiffness modulus1902.188 MPa————
Stiffness deflection2.853 mm————

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
Tensile2026-09-27
Impact2026-09-27
IzodNot recorded
CharpyNot recorded
Stiffness2026-09-26
Thermal2026-09-26

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Yasin Standard Natural POM Natural has a profile awaiting complete scoring evidence. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Tensile.
Data-driven review: Yasin Standard Natural POM Natural has incomplete scoring evidence or pending method references. Overall suitability and ranking are unavailable. Available scored axes can be inspected separately; missing scores do not establish weak material performance.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Tensile
Dataset position
—
—

Strengths

  • Best available signal: Consistency at 70/100.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 29/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Layer adhesion: 31/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.

Recommended applications

  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall———
Tensile29/100124 / 243Better than 49%
Impact———
Izod———
Charpy———
Stiffness63/100188 / 240Better than 22%
Consistency70/100176 / 243Better than 28%
Layer adhesion31/10088 / 243Better than 64%
Thermal51/10016 / 226Better than 93%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
No stronger same-base-material alternatives were identified in the current governed dataset.

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
No same-material peers with governed score context are available.

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.