Public engineering report

Yasin Standard Green PCTG Green

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0238
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
Generated 2026-10-04 18:07:33
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Rigid test coverage
Partial; 4/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 0/2 measured, 0/2 scored; Overall unavailable: missing measurements or references; policy engineering-score-v70-1
Engineering axes
5/8
Public MSRP
$33.44 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0238
MaterialYasin Standard Green PCTG Green
ManufacturerYasin
Product lineStandard
Base materialPCTG
CategoryStandard
Variant / finish—
Reinforcement—
ColorGreen

Governed engineering profile

Overall—
Tensile22/100
Impact—
Izod—
Charpy—
Stiffness53/100
Consistency54/100
Layer adhesion30/100
Thermal39/100
Best available axisconsistency

Engineering score profile

Overall
—
Tensile
22/100
Impact
—
Izod
—
Charpy
—
Stiffness
53/100
Consistency
54/100
Layer adhesion
30/100
Thermal
39/100

Engineering radar

TensileLegacy Impact %IzodCharpyStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PCTG
Manufacturer average - Yasin

Legacy Impact radar: 10.309 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.

Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.

Fixture thermal result

78 °C · score 39/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall———
Tensile22/10028/10025/100
Impact———
Izod—8/10011/100
Charpy—8/10012/100
Stiffness53/10060/10075/100
Consistency54/10076/10072/100
Layer adhesion30/10024/10019/100
Thermal39/100——

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright8.044 MPa3.704 MPa46%1010/10
Tensile flat26.793 MPa12.068 MPa45%1010/10
Impact upright2.656 kJ/m²0.768 kJ/m²28.9%1010/10
Impact flat9.091 kJ/m²1.263 kJ/m²13.9%1010/10
Izod—————
Charpy—————
Stiffness modulus1583.796 MPa————
Stiffness deflection3.426 mm————

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
Tensile2026-08-20
Impact2026-08-20
IzodNot recorded
CharpyNot recorded
Stiffness2026-08-20
Thermal2026-08-20

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Yasin Standard Green PCTG Green has a profile awaiting complete scoring evidence. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Tensile.
Data-driven review: Yasin Standard Green PCTG Green has incomplete scoring evidence or pending method references. Overall suitability and ranking are unavailable. Available scored axes can be inspected separately; missing scores do not establish weak material performance.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Tensile
Dataset position
—
—

Strengths

  • Layer adhesion: 30/100. Z-axis bonding is better than the material-family context.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 22/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Consistency: 54/100. Repeatability may not be the best reason to choose this filament.
  • Layer adhesion: 30/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Complete scoring evidence and approved method references are required before assessing an overall balance of properties.

Recommended applications

  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall———
Tensile22/100183 / 243Better than 25%
Impact———
Izod———
Charpy———
Stiffness53/100213 / 240Better than 12%
Consistency54/100232 / 243Better than 5%
Layer adhesion30/10090 / 243Better than 63%
Thermal39/10058 / 226Better than 75%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
No stronger same-base-material alternatives were identified in the current governed dataset.

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
MAT00393D Fuel PCTG PCTG Pro CF Black3D Fuel45/10027/100—n/an/a
MAT00403D Fuel PCTG Toolbox Red PCTG Pro GF Red3D Fuel39/10025/100—n/an/a
MAT0267Coex 3D Prime Banany Yellow PCTG YellowCoex 3D35/10027/100—n/an/a
MAT00413D Fuel PCTG Cobalt Blue PCTG Pro Blue3D Fuel—34/100—n/an/a
MAT0227Spectrum Smart Sky Blue PCTG BlueSpectrum—34/100—n/an/a

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.