3DPIceland Engineering Platform 3DPIceland Labs Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology Generated 2026-10-04 18:07:33
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Legacy Impact radar: 10.309 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.
Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.
Fixture thermal result
78 °C · score 39/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1 Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.
Material and manufacturer context
Metric
Selected material
Material average
Manufacturer average
Overall
—
—
—
Tensile
22/100
28/100
25/100
Impact
—
—
—
Izod
—
8/100
11/100
Charpy
—
8/100
12/100
Stiffness
53/100
60/100
75/100
Consistency
54/100
76/100
72/100
Layer adhesion
30/100
24/100
19/100
Thermal
39/100
—
—
Verified measurement results
Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.
Measurement
Average
Std. deviation
CV
Samples
Confidence
Tensile upright
8.044 MPa
3.704 MPa
46%
10
10/10
Tensile flat
26.793 MPa
12.068 MPa
45%
10
10/10
Impact upright
2.656 kJ/m²
0.768 kJ/m²
28.9%
10
10/10
Impact flat
9.091 kJ/m²
1.263 kJ/m²
13.9%
10
10/10
Izod
—
—
—
—
—
Charpy
—
—
—
—
—
Stiffness modulus
1583.796 MPa
—
—
—
—
Stiffness deflection
3.426 mm
—
—
—
—
Measurement provenance
Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.
Module
Measured date
Tensile
2026-08-20
Impact
2026-08-20
Izod
Not recorded
Charpy
Not recorded
Stiffness
2026-08-20
Thermal
2026-08-20
Engineering interpretation
Summary: Yasin Standard Green PCTG Green has a profile awaiting complete scoring evidence. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Tensile.
Data-driven review: Yasin Standard Green PCTG Green has incomplete scoring evidence or pending method references. Overall suitability and ranking are unavailable. Available scored axes can be inspected separately; missing scores do not establish weak material performance.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Tensile
Dataset position
—
—
Strengths
Layer adhesion: 30/100. Z-axis bonding is better than the material-family context.
Limitations
Tensile: 22/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
Consistency: 54/100. Repeatability may not be the best reason to choose this filament.
Layer adhesion: 30/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.
Engineering trade-offs
Complete scoring evidence and approved method references are required before assessing an overall balance of properties.
Recommended applications
Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
Avoid high tensile load applications
Metric rankings and percentiles
Metric
Score
Rank
Percentile
Overall
—
—
—
Tensile
22/100
183 / 243
Better than 25%
Impact
—
—
—
Izod
—
—
—
Charpy
—
—
—
Stiffness
53/100
213 / 240
Better than 12%
Consistency
54/100
232 / 243
Better than 5%
Layer adhesion
30/100
90 / 243
Better than 63%
Thermal
39/100
58 / 226
Better than 75%
Decision guidance
Overall suitability is unavailable until the required measurements and method references are complete.
Do not choose it as a tensile-strength benchmark material.
Better alternatives
MaterialID
Material
Manufacturer
Overall
Tensile
Impact
Izod
Charpy
No stronger same-base-material alternatives were identified in the current governed dataset.
Peer context
Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.
Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.