Public engineering report

Yasin Standard Green PCTG Green

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0238
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v60.0.6 WORKFLOW-RELIABILITY - Bug Fixes and Workflow Reliability
Generated 2026-08-25 19:02:26
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Test coverage
Complete
Engineering axes
6/6
Public MSRP
$33.44 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0238
MaterialYasin Standard Green PCTG Green
ManufacturerYasin
Product lineStandard
Base materialPCTG
CategoryStandard
Variant / finish
Reinforcement
ColorGreen

Governed engineering profile

Overall37/100
Tensile22/100
Impact12/100
Stiffness53/100
Consistency67/100
Layer adhesion30/100
Thermal39/100
Best available axisconsistency

Engineering score profile

Overall
37/100
Tensile
22/100
Impact
12/100
Stiffness
53/100
Consistency
67/100
Layer adhesion
30/100
Thermal
39/100

Engineering radar

TensileImpactStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PCTG
Manufacturer average - Yasin

All axes use existing governed 0–100 engineering scores. Missing axes are shown at zero and remain listed as n/a elsewhere in the report.

Fixture thermal result

78 °C · score 39/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall37/10043/10043/100
Tensile22/10028/10024/100
Impact12/10022/10025/100
Stiffness53/10061/10075/100
Consistency67/10077/10073/100
Layer adhesion30/10026/10019/100
Thermal39/100

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright8.044 MPa3.704 MPa46%1010/10
Tensile flat26.793 MPa12.068 MPa45%1010/10
Impact upright55.154 kJ/m²15.955 kJ/m²28.9%1010/10
Impact flat188.766 kJ/m²26.218 kJ/m²13.9%1010/10
Stiffness modulus1583.796 MPa
Stiffness deflection3.426 mm

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
Tensile2026-08-20
Impact2026-08-20
Stiffness2026-08-20
Thermal2026-08-20

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Yasin Standard Green PCTG Green has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is below its material-family average by 6,1 points and below its manufacturer average by 6,3 points. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Impact.
Data-driven review: Yasin Standard Green PCTG Green is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 6% overall, is below the material-family average by 6,1 points, and is below the manufacturer average by 6,3 points. Its strongest engineering signal is Consistency, while Impact is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Impact
Dataset position
Better than 6%
221 / 234

Strengths

  • Best available signal: Consistency at 67/100.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 22/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Impact: 12/100. Avoid high impact or shock-loaded components without additional validation.
  • Consistency: 67/100. Repeatability may not be the best reason to choose this filament.
  • Layer adhesion: 30/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
  • The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications
  • Avoid high impact components

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall37/100221 / 234Better than 6%
Tensile22/100169 / 226Better than 26%
Impact12/100204 / 226Better than 10%
Stiffness53/100198 / 223Better than 12%
Consistency67/100217 / 231Better than 6%
Layer adhesion30/10085 / 226Better than 63%
Thermal39/10054 / 209Better than 75%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT00393D Fuel PCTG PCTG Pro CF Black3D Fuel48/10027/10026/100
MAT00413D Fuel PCTG Cobalt Blue PCTG Pro Blue3D Fuel44/10034/10017/100
MAT0227Spectrum Smart Sky Blue PCTG BlueSpectrum43/10034/10023/100

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT00393D Fuel PCTG PCTG Pro CF Black3D Fuel48/10027/10026/100
MAT00413D Fuel PCTG Cobalt Blue PCTG Pro Blue3D Fuel44/10034/10017/100
MAT0227Spectrum Smart Sky Blue PCTG BlueSpectrum43/10034/10023/100
MAT00403D Fuel PCTG Toolbox Red PCTG Pro GF Red3D Fuel42/10025/10031/100

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.