Public printing recommendation

Prusa3D Prusament PC Blend PC Black

MaterialID MAT0033

3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v60.0.6 WORKFLOW-RELIABILITY - Bug Fixes and Workflow Reliability
2026-08-25 19:05:46

Guidance boundary: values below are shared base-material guidance resolved only through the canonical BaseMaterialId link. They are not manufacturer-, spool- or printer-specific validated settings. Missing fields remain Not recorded.
Overall
56/100
Engineering axes
6/5
Public rank
26 / 234
MSRP USD/kg
49.78

Engineering profile

Overall
56/100
Tensile
39/100
Impact
46/100
Stiffness
68/100
Consistency
87/100
Layer adhesion
40/100

Recommended applications

  • Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches

Measured strengths

  • Layer adhesion: 40/100. Z-axis bonding is better than the material-family context.
  • Consistency: 87/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.
  • Impact: 46/100. Impact behavior is competitive against the material-family context.
  • Tensile: 39/100. Tensile behavior is competitive against the material-family context.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 39/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Stiffness: 68/100. Expect less shape stability than the stronger materials in the same family.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.

Base-material printing guidance

GuidanceMinimumRecommendedMaximumUnit
Nozzle temperature275275280°C
Bed temperature110110115°C
Print speed55130130mm/s
Cooling152025%
GuidanceValueUnit
Cooling guidanceLow
Drying temperature80°C
Drying time8hours
EnclosureRequired
Printer / G-code referencePrusaCoreOneL
Slicer profile referencePrusament PC Blend

Print workflow checks

Decision guidance

Stronger same-family alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
Confirm exact settings against the manufacturer profile, spool label and actual printer/material combination. Results do not replace application-specific validation.

Testing methodology · Download PDF