Public test session report
Polymaker HTPLA PLA Black
MaterialID MAT0064

3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
2026-10-04 18:10:39
Traceability boundary: canonical per-module measured dates are shown below. Session identifier, time of day, operator, printer/slicer profile and environmental conditions are Not recorded and are never inferred.
Measurement provenance
Canonical SQLite measured dates use ISO format; missing dates remain Not recorded.
| Module | Measured date |
|---|---|
| Tensile | Not recorded |
| Impact | Not recorded |
| Izod | Not recorded |
| Charpy | Not recorded |
| Stiffness | Not recorded |
Rigid test status
Partial
Partial
Rigid result modules
4/6
4/6
Rigid specimen/result records
41
41
Public details
Approved
Approved
Rigid specimen and result quality
| Module | Orientation | Average | Std. dev. | CV | Specimens | Confidence | Validation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tensile | Upright | 4,076 MPa | 1,569 MPa | 0,385% | 10 | 10/10 | OK |
| Tensile | Flat | 27,916 MPa | 3,561 MPa | 0,128% | 10 | 10/10 | OK |
| Impact | Upright | 2,86 kJ/m² | 1,134 kJ/m² | 0,397% | 10 | 10/10 | OK |
| Impact | Flat | 13,104 kJ/m² | 0,85 kJ/m² | 0,065% | 10 | 10/10 | OK |
| Stiffness | Three-point bend | 2460,163 MPa | n/a | n/a | 1 | Complete | OK |
Recorded native inputs
| Module | Input set | Recorded values |
|---|---|---|
| Tensile | Upright force inputs (N) | 33, 16, 22, 14, 24, 27, 20, 42, 23, 44 |
| Tensile | Flat force inputs (N) | 201, 150, 180, 194, 144, 202, 174, 162, 207, 201 |
| Impact | Upright needle inputs (%) | 1,00, 4,00, 4,00, 1,00, 4,00, 4,00, 4,50, 3,50, 5,00, 4,50 |
| Impact | Flat needle inputs (%) | 16,00, 15,00, 17,00, 15,00, 17,00, 15,50, 17,00, 15,00, 15,00, 17,50 |
| Stiffness | Revolutions / degrees | 2 / 30 |
Approved test notes
Method and equipment context
Purpose-built tensile, pendulum impact and three-point bend apparatus are used with the governed Settings Manager constants consumed by ResultsService. Results are comparative and do not claim accredited-laboratory equipment.
Testing methodology · Engineering methodology whitepaper · Download PDF