Public test session report
Prusa3D Buddy3D PLA Silk Copper
MaterialID MAT0085

3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
2026-10-04 18:10:39
Traceability boundary: canonical per-module measured dates are shown below. Session identifier, time of day, operator, printer/slicer profile and environmental conditions are Not recorded and are never inferred.
Measurement provenance
Canonical SQLite measured dates use ISO format; missing dates remain Not recorded.
| Module | Measured date |
|---|---|
| Tensile | Not recorded |
| Impact | Not recorded |
| Izod | Not recorded |
| Charpy | Not recorded |
| Stiffness | Not recorded |
Rigid test status
Partial
Partial
Rigid result modules
4/6
4/6
Rigid specimen/result records
40
40
Public details
Approved
Approved
Rigid specimen and result quality
| Module | Orientation | Average | Std. dev. | CV | Specimens | Confidence | Validation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tensile | Upright | 5,506 MPa | 2,267 MPa | 0,412% | 10 | 10/10 | OK |
| Tensile | Flat | 22,548 MPa | 6,171 MPa | 0,274% | 10 | 10/10 | OK |
| Impact | Upright | 4,855 kJ/m² | 1,083 kJ/m² | 0,223% | 9 | 9/10 | OK |
| Impact | Flat | 11,738 kJ/m² | 0,957 kJ/m² | 0,082% | 10 | 10/10 | OK |
| Stiffness | Three-point bend | 2753,914 MPa | n/a | n/a | 1 | Complete | OK |
Recorded native inputs
| Module | Input set | Recorded values |
|---|---|---|
| Tensile | Upright force inputs (N) | 37, 44, 46, 42, 14, 23, 30, 15, 56, 51 |
| Tensile | Flat force inputs (N) | 158, 137, 112, 109, 111, 202, 177, 196, 174, 90 |
| Impact | Upright needle inputs (%) | 5,00, 5,00, 5,00, 8,00, 7,00, 8,00, 5,00, 5,00, 6,00, |
| Impact | Flat needle inputs (%) | 13,00, 14,00, 13,00, 16,00, 15,00, 16,00, 14,50, 13,00, 14,00, 15,00 |
| Stiffness | Revolutions / degrees | 1 / 310 |
Approved test notes
Method and equipment context
Purpose-built tensile, pendulum impact and three-point bend apparatus are used with the governed Settings Manager constants consumed by ResultsService. Results are comparative and do not claim accredited-laboratory equipment.
Testing methodology · Engineering methodology whitepaper · Download PDF