Public test session report
Yasin Standard Silk PLA Silk Pink
MaterialID MAT0091

3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
2026-10-04 18:10:39
Traceability boundary: canonical per-module measured dates are shown below. Session identifier, time of day, operator, printer/slicer profile and environmental conditions are Not recorded and are never inferred.
Measurement provenance
Canonical SQLite measured dates use ISO format; missing dates remain Not recorded.
| Module | Measured date |
|---|---|
| Tensile | Not recorded |
| Impact | Not recorded |
| Izod | Not recorded |
| Charpy | Not recorded |
| Stiffness | Not recorded |
Rigid test status
Partial
Partial
Rigid result modules
4/6
4/6
Rigid specimen/result records
40
40
Public details
Approved
Approved
Rigid specimen and result quality
| Module | Orientation | Average | Std. dev. | CV | Specimens | Confidence | Validation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tensile | Upright | 5,127 MPa | 1,216 MPa | 0,237% | 9 | 9/10 | OK |
| Tensile | Flat | 45,881 MPa | 6,034 MPa | 0,132% | 10 | 10/10 | OK |
| Impact | Upright | 0,961 kJ/m² | 0,51 kJ/m² | 0,53% | 10 | 10/10 | OK |
| Impact | Flat | 5,264 kJ/m² | 1,223 kJ/m² | 0,232% | 10 | 10/10 | OK |
| Stiffness | Three-point bend | 2795,64 MPa | n/a | n/a | 1 | Complete | OK |
Recorded native inputs
| Module | Input set | Recorded values |
|---|---|---|
| Tensile | Upright force inputs (N) | 21, 37, 42, 24, 38, 29, 40, 28, 41, |
| Tensile | Flat force inputs (N) | 336, 302, 219, 311, 340, 298, 303, 335, 245, 294 |
| Impact | Upright needle inputs (%) | 1,00, 1,00, 1,00, 1,00, 1,00, 1,00, 1,00, 1,00, 1,00, 3,00 |
| Impact | Flat needle inputs (%) | 6,50, 5,00, 6,00, 6,00, 7,00, 4,50, 7,00, 10,00, 6,00, 7,00 |
| Stiffness | Revolutions / degrees | 1 / 300 |
Approved test notes
Method and equipment context
Purpose-built tensile, pendulum impact and three-point bend apparatus are used with the governed Settings Manager constants consumed by ResultsService. Results are comparative and do not claim accredited-laboratory equipment.
Testing methodology · Engineering methodology whitepaper · Download PDF