Public test session report
Thorwell Standard PLA Blue
MaterialID MAT0119

3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
2026-10-04 18:10:39
Traceability boundary: canonical per-module measured dates are shown below. Session identifier, time of day, operator, printer/slicer profile and environmental conditions are Not recorded and are never inferred.
Measurement provenance
Canonical SQLite measured dates use ISO format; missing dates remain Not recorded.
| Module | Measured date |
|---|---|
| Tensile | Not recorded |
| Impact | Not recorded |
| Izod | Not recorded |
| Charpy | Not recorded |
| Stiffness | Not recorded |
Rigid test status
Partial
Partial
Rigid result modules
3/6
3/6
Rigid specimen/result records
41
41
Public details
Approved
Approved
Rigid specimen and result quality
| Module | Orientation | Average | Std. dev. | CV | Specimens | Confidence | Validation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tensile | Upright | 11,043 MPa | 2,523 MPa | 0,228% | 10 | 10/10 | OK |
| Tensile | Flat | 39,759 MPa | 4,19 MPa | 0,105% | 10 | 10/10 | OK |
| Impact | Upright | 4,247 kJ/m² | 1,891 kJ/m² | 0,445% | 10 | 10/10 | OK |
| Impact | Flat | 9,752 kJ/m² | 1,27 kJ/m² | 0,13% | 10 | 10/10 | OK |
| Stiffness | Three-point bend | 2580,591 MPa | n/a | n/a | 1 | Complete | OK |
Recorded native inputs
| Module | Input set | Recorded values |
|---|---|---|
| Tensile | Upright force inputs (N) | 88, 73, 91, 44, 78, 80, 74, 84, 48, 58 |
| Tensile | Flat force inputs (N) | 284, 218, 295, 272, 222, 270, 232, 244, 271, 277 |
| Impact | Upright needle inputs (%) | 7,50, 1,50, 2,00, 6,00, 2,50, 5,50, 7,00, 6,50, 7,00, 7,00 |
| Impact | Flat needle inputs (%) | 12,00, 9,00, 12,00, 12,00, 12,00, 12,50, 13,00, 11,00, 15,00, 11,00 |
| Stiffness | Revolutions / degrees | 1 / 355 |
Approved test notes
Method and equipment context
Purpose-built tensile, pendulum impact and three-point bend apparatus are used with the governed Settings Manager constants consumed by ResultsService. Results are comparative and do not claim accredited-laboratory equipment.
Testing methodology · Engineering methodology whitepaper · Download PDF