Public test session report
Thorwell Standard PLA Black
MaterialID MAT0156

3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
2026-10-04 18:10:39
Traceability boundary: canonical per-module measured dates are shown below. Session identifier, time of day, operator, printer/slicer profile and environmental conditions are Not recorded and are never inferred.
Measurement provenance
Canonical SQLite measured dates use ISO format; missing dates remain Not recorded.
| Module | Measured date |
|---|---|
| Tensile | Not recorded |
| Impact | Not recorded |
| Izod | Not recorded |
| Charpy | Not recorded |
| Stiffness | Not recorded |
Rigid test status
Partial
Partial
Rigid result modules
4/6
4/6
Rigid specimen/result records
40
40
Public details
Approved
Approved
Rigid specimen and result quality
| Module | Orientation | Average | Std. dev. | CV | Specimens | Confidence | Validation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tensile | Upright | 11,006 MPa | 4,467 MPa | 0,406% | 9 | 9/10 | OK |
| Tensile | Flat | 38,206 MPa | 12,154 MPa | 0,318% | 10 | 10/10 | OK |
| Impact | Upright | 6,617 kJ/m² | 0,751 kJ/m² | 0,114% | 10 | 10/10 | OK |
| Impact | Flat | 11,862 kJ/m² | 0,617 kJ/m² | 0,052% | 10 | 10/10 | OK |
| Stiffness | Three-point bend | 2860,655 MPa | n/a | n/a | 1 | Complete | OK |
Recorded native inputs
| Module | Input set | Recorded values |
|---|---|---|
| Tensile | Upright force inputs (N) | 51, 52, 139, 62, 59, 81, 87, 70, 43, |
| Tensile | Flat force inputs (N) | 301, 316, 129, 152, 227, 285, 355, 328, 206, 185 |
| Impact | Upright needle inputs (%) | 9,00, 9,00, 9,00, 8,50, 9,00, 8,00, 8,00, 7,50, 7,00, 6,50 |
| Impact | Flat needle inputs (%) | 16,00, 14,00, 15,00, 15,00, 14,00, 15,00, 14,50, 14,00, 13,50, 14,00 |
| Stiffness | Revolutions / degrees | 1 / 285 |
Approved test notes
Method and equipment context
Purpose-built tensile, pendulum impact and three-point bend apparatus are used with the governed Settings Manager constants consumed by ResultsService. Results are comparative and do not claim accredited-laboratory equipment.
Testing methodology · Engineering methodology whitepaper · Download PDF